Anonymous wrote:The Appletree review was very surprising. They were deemed as not meeting goals but the PCSB decided to use its discretion to continue the school with conditions.
Anonymous wrote:The Appletree review was very surprising. They were deemed as not meeting goals but the PCSB decided to use its discretion to continue the school with conditions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The PCSB meeting is in just a couple of hours and no materials are out yet. They have SEED on the agenda for "health and safety" which is likely related to the two alleged sexual assaults there. That health and safety item along with a bunch of truancy notices, a new charter application vote, multiple reviews (including a couple of schools not performing that well) and a financial monitoring discussing - one has to wonder which one of these topics (or multiple topics) is causing them to be so delayed in getting out meeting materials.
The afternoon on the day of the meeting is pretty normal IIRC. I think it's objectionable, but it's not unusual.
Anonymous wrote:The PCSB meeting is in just a couple of hours and no materials are out yet. They have SEED on the agenda for "health and safety" which is likely related to the two alleged sexual assaults there. That health and safety item along with a bunch of truancy notices, a new charter application vote, multiple reviews (including a couple of schools not performing that well) and a financial monitoring discussing - one has to wonder which one of these topics (or multiple topics) is causing them to be so delayed in getting out meeting materials.
Anonymous wrote:Pretty sad to see 2 rivers on the truancy concern list. A lot of the families I know who send their kids there would be better off at their inbound schools, in my opinion, but I guess the parents made their decision.
Anonymous wrote:Just want to say "thanks" to the person or people who post these updates and keep track of them. Very informative.