Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:- I don’t completely disagree that there is some bias- but then linked, . . .
Biden wasn’t sharp as a tack, Biden was involved in hunters crooked business dealings, blah blah. . .
Seriously? . . .
What in the world?
I know right? CRAZY TALK! Biden is as sharp as ever!!
Maybe not, but it’s months later. Haven’t they moved on? Aren’t there other important issue to discuss rather than someone who is no longer president and his sons laptop?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm always confused that the right claims the MSM is biased, but yet also cannot offer any alternate source. I mean, Fox News is a joke and also the best they've got to offer?
FWIW, I read National Review sometimes which is conservative, but it's also still more opinion than basic factual.
This. The right wing wants to sow distrust in legacy media, yet the right wing "alternative" is even less fact-based, and even more dishonest, untrustworthy and biased than the legacy media.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:- I don’t completely disagree that there is some bias- but then linked, . . .
Biden wasn’t sharp as a tack, Biden was involved in hunters crooked business dealings, blah blah. . .
Seriously? . . .
What in the world?
I know right? CRAZY TALK! Biden is as sharp as ever!!
Is Biden the president? No? So who the eff cares?
Anonymous wrote:I'm always confused that the right claims the MSM is biased, but yet also cannot offer any alternate source. I mean, Fox News is a joke and also the best they've got to offer?
FWIW, I read National Review sometimes which is conservative, but it's also still more opinion than basic factual.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:- I don’t completely disagree that there is some bias- but then linked, . . .
Biden wasn’t sharp as a tack, Biden was involved in hunters crooked business dealings, blah blah. . .
Seriously? . . .
What in the world?
I know right? CRAZY TALK! Biden is as sharp as ever!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:- I don’t completely disagree that there is some bias- but then linked, . . .
Biden wasn’t sharp as a tack, Biden was involved in hunters crooked business dealings, blah blah. . .
Seriously? . . .
What in the world?
I know right? CRAZY TALK! Biden is as sharp as ever!!
Maybe not, but it’s months later. Haven’t they moved on? Aren’t there other important issue to discuss rather than someone who is no longer president and his sons laptop?
Running stories about Biden at this point is just diversion from running relevant news that they don't want their readers to know. Please tell me that you know that.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:- I don’t completely disagree that there is some bias- but then linked, . . .
Biden wasn’t sharp as a tack, Biden was involved in hunters crooked business dealings, blah blah. . .
Seriously? . . .
What in the world?
I know right? CRAZY TALK! Biden is as sharp as ever!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:- I don’t completely disagree that there is some bias- but then linked, . . .
Biden wasn’t sharp as a tack, Biden was involved in hunters crooked business dealings, blah blah. . .
Seriously? . . .
What in the world?
I know right? CRAZY TALK! Biden is as sharp as ever!!
Anonymous wrote:Pretty much all media is a complete joke now. Legacy media, new media, left, right, all of it. It’s all garbage now, for myriad reasons.
- a 30+ year photojournalist
Anonymous wrote:- I don’t completely disagree that there is some bias- but then linked, . . .
Biden wasn’t sharp as a tack, Biden was involved in hunters crooked business dealings, blah blah. . .
Seriously? . . .
What in the world?
Anonymous wrote:Pretty much all media is a complete joke now. Legacy media, new media, left, right, all of it. It’s all garbage now, for myriad reasons.
- a 30+ year photojournalist