Anonymous wrote:Ah wikipedia. Been a while since I hopped on the author section. For a good laugh, head over to the human anus page to see intense discussion on the appropriateness of displaying male or female buttholes.

I see they finally settled on a womans butthole without genitals on display. Beats the hair dudes hole they had a few years ago.

I am not the OP, just want to point out... the Classic Trumper deflection.

Rules: When you know you are wrong, change the subject. Deflect. Make ad hominem attacks. Be crass if at all possible (it's distraction; also it's funny (see Pete Hegseth's staff). But never, under any circumstances, engage in an earnest discussion on the subject.

Anonymous wrote:Trump's top DC lawyer trying to take away Wikipedia's tax-exempt status.

https://www.thefp.com/p/trump-prosecutor-threatens-wikipedia?hide_intro_popup=true

Fascist doesn't want the public to have access to facts

Republicans are all about taxing increases. Bet Wiki will move overseas. More job losses under Trump.

Trump's top DC lawyer trying to take away Wikipedia's tax-exempt status.

https://www.thefp.com/p/trump-prosecutor-threatens-wikipedia?hide_intro_popup=true

Fascist doesn't want the public to have access to facts