Don't worry, the FDA is busy not regulating baby food.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Raw is better for you anyways drink that instead.

The benefit of not raw was the whole "it won't kill you!" thing.

If they're getting rid of that...

Raw milk: 0–2 deaths since 2000.
Pasteurized milk: 3–17 deaths since 2000.

Now do it with deaths per 1000 people or 1000 glasses or something like that. Since the numbers of people willing to risk drinking raw milk is extremely small vs the (hundreds of ?) millions who regularly drink pasteurized milk, just reporting numbers of deaths known or assumed to be related to pasteurized vs raw milk like that is deliberately deceptive.

Anonymous wrote:Raw is better for you anyways drink that instead.

My grandfather got bovine TB that way in the 1930s.

Ugh. We can do without milk but not cheese and yogurt.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Raw is better for you anyways drink that instead.

The benefit of not raw was the whole "it won't kill you!" thing.

If they're getting rid of that...

Raw milk: 0–2 deaths since 2000.
Pasteurized milk: 3–17 deaths since 2000.

Because I know you’ll ask

(https://www.cdc.gov/fdoss/annual-reports/index.html).

(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212979/).

(https://www.realmilk.com/safety/chronology-of-pasteurization/).

(https://www.cdc.gov/fdoss/annual-reports/index.html).

(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212979/).

(https://www.realmilk.com/safety/chronology-of-pasteurization/).

All these links are broken or point to a study about cement composites.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Raw is better for you anyways drink that instead.

The benefit of not raw was the whole "it won't kill you!" thing.

If they're getting rid of that...

Raw milk: 0–2 deaths since 2000.
Pasteurized milk: 3–17 deaths since 2000.

Because I know you’ll ask

(https://www.cdc.gov/fdoss/annual-reports/index.html).

(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212979/).

(https://www.realmilk.com/safety/chronology-of-pasteurization/).

(https://www.cdc.gov/fdoss/annual-reports/index.html).

(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212979/).

(https://www.realmilk.com/safety/chronology-of-pasteurization/).

Anonymous wrote:Switched to soy milk, with occasional almond milk, oat milk. Healthier and safer.

These taste like sad gray water and don't have as much protein or calcium. What's the point?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Raw is better for you anyways drink that instead.

Please stop. Somebody could die if they read that and think it’s true. Not a joke.

Who is so stupid that they would just believe something an anonymous person wrote on the internet?! And if they would, maybe ….?

Anonymous wrote:Raw is better for you anyways drink that instead.

Only if you have your own cow in your backyard. Otherwise, no.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Raw is better for you anyways drink that instead.

The benefit of not raw was the whole "it won't kill you!" thing.

If they're getting rid of that...

Raw milk: 0–2 deaths since 2000.
Pasteurized milk: 3–17 deaths since 2000.

Switched to soy milk, with occasional almond milk, oat milk. Healthier and safer.

Anonymous wrote:Raw is better for you anyways drink that instead.

Please stop. Somebody could die if they read that and think it’s true. Not a joke.

Anonymous wrote:Raw is better for you anyways drink that instead.

The benefit of not raw was the whole "it won't kill you!" thing.

If they're getting rid of that...

Raw is better for you anyways drink that instead.

Well I guess it’ll be a crap shoot now…winning!
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/