Anonymous wrote:That is a lot of cash with 10 years of deferred comp on the way. You also have less than 10% of your net worth in real estate. With that level of assets, I'd consider buying more real estate, especially if you would enjoy a second home or a nicer first home. We keep about 20-30% of our assets in our homes which seems to be a nice balance and gives us plenty of other investable assets.
Anonymous wrote:If I were retiring in the next few months, I would want seven years of spending in cash or stable value.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Allocation is meaningless if you don't know totals.
I once reviewed a 80 year old women's portfolio and she was 90/10 allocation and was coded moderate risk and she agreed to that.
Well I pulled her account she had $500 million. So $450 million in Stocks and $50 million in Cash and short term treasuries.
50 million liquid at 80 is very conservative yet she was 90 percent stocks.
OP here. I wasn't going to go to that level of detail, but thought it was obvious when I stated the amount of cash.
Actual numbers:
Equities $7.43M
Tax Exempt Bonds $530K
Taxable Bonds $2.79M
Cash $1.98M (529 is $530K)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Allocation is meaningless if you don't know totals.
I once reviewed a 80 year old women's portfolio and she was 90/10 allocation and was coded moderate risk and she agreed to that.
Well I pulled her account she had $500 million. So $450 million in Stocks and $50 million in Cash and short term treasuries.
50 million liquid at 80 is very conservative yet she was 90 percent stocks.
OP here. I wasn't going to go to that level of detail, but thought it was obvious when I stated the amount of cash.
Actual numbers:
Equities $7.43M
Tax Exempt Bonds $530K
Taxable Bonds $2.79M
Cash $1.98M (529 is $530K)
It was obvious when you stated the amount of cash, PP just isn't very bright. I think you are in excellent shape.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Allocation is meaningless if you don't know totals.
I once reviewed a 80 year old women's portfolio and she was 90/10 allocation and was coded moderate risk and she agreed to that.
Well I pulled her account she had $500 million. So $450 million in Stocks and $50 million in Cash and short term treasuries.
50 million liquid at 80 is very conservative yet she was 90 percent stocks.
OP here. I wasn't going to go to that level of detail, but thought it was obvious when I stated the amount of cash.
Actual numbers:
Equities $7.43M
Tax Exempt Bonds $530K
Taxable Bonds $2.79M
Cash $1.98M (529 is $530K)
Anonymous wrote:Allocation is meaningless if you don't know totals.
I once reviewed a 80 year old women's portfolio and she was 90/10 allocation and was coded moderate risk and she agreed to that.
Well I pulled her account she had $500 million. So $450 million in Stocks and $50 million in Cash and short term treasuries.
50 million liquid at 80 is very conservative yet she was 90 percent stocks.
Anonymous wrote:If I were retiring in the next few months, I would want seven years of spending in cash or stable value.