Anonymous wrote:Can those who say to keep siblings together elaborate? Are there non-obvious reasons why? We like our home school, but the center school was really impressive. It seems kid would have friends at center school and also be able to continue after-school activities with kids from home school. The only major drawback is younger kid, who will not qualify for AAP, actively relies on older kid for help. I hate the idea of splitting them up.
Anonymous wrote:Can those who say to keep siblings together elaborate? Are there non-obvious reasons why? We like our home school, but the center school was really impressive. It seems kid would have friends at center school and also be able to continue after-school activities with kids from home school. The only major drawback is younger kid, who will not qualify for AAP, actively relies on older kid for help. I hate the idea of splitting them up.
Anonymous wrote:Can those who say to keep siblings together elaborate? Are there non-obvious reasons why? We like our home school, but the center school was really impressive. It seems kid would have friends at center school and also be able to continue after-school activities with kids from home school. The only major drawback is younger kid, who will not qualify for AAP, actively relies on older kid for help. I hate the idea of splitting them up.
we have other kids in the school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are struggling with whether to keep our child in the base school or go to the center. We had been leaning toward staying but the cohort is small and the program is brand new, so we are a little concerned there won't be a peer group. The principal said they are doing the cluster model. Reasons we were leaning toward staying is that our school has immersion, our child is very happy there, and we have other kids in the school. Our DC is not complaining that she is bored currently.
I could have written this. My current thinking is that if it’s not broken, don’t fix it. Immersion has so many benefits. I might feel differently if it were possible to re-enter immersion if the center doesn’t turn out to be a good fit, but that’s just not the situation.
Anonymous wrote:We are struggling with whether to keep our child in the base school or go to the center. We had been leaning toward staying but the cohort is small and the program is brand new, so we are a little concerned there won't be a peer group. The principal said they are doing the cluster model. Reasons we were leaning toward staying is that our school has immersion, our child is very happy there, and we have other kids in the school. Our DC is not complaining that she is bored currently.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What language is your child participating in? We were at Fox Mill with Japanese and no LLIV, it came later. We chose immersion over LIV because we thought early exposure to a language like Japanese was valuable and the school had a strong advanced math program. We also knew we could defer until he went to Carson for MS. That way he could complete 2 years of foreign language and participate in the AAP classes. At the time, Carson did not allow 2 years of any other language except for the Japanese Immersion kids.
If my kid was in Spanish or French we would have considered the move because those languages are more available at MS and HS.
We also asked our child for his thoughts. He might have been in 3rd grade but it is his education. If he didn’t seem to be getting much out of the Japanese or was having social issues and wanted to move we would have considered that.
She's in Spanish.
Anonymous wrote:What language is your child participating in? We were at Fox Mill with Japanese and no LLIV, it came later. We chose immersion over LIV because we thought early exposure to a language like Japanese was valuable and the school had a strong advanced math program. We also knew we could defer until he went to Carson for MS. That way he could complete 2 years of foreign language and participate in the AAP classes. At the time, Carson did not allow 2 years of any other language except for the Japanese Immersion kids.
If my kid was in Spanish or French we would have considered the move because those languages are more available at MS and HS.
We also asked our child for his thoughts. He might have been in 3rd grade but it is his education. If he didn’t seem to be getting much out of the Japanese or was having social issues and wanted to move we would have considered that.
Anonymous wrote:If your base is high SES, or even mid SES, your child will have a peer group even in the cluster model. Our base/center is in the Woodson pyramid and my kids had academic peers in both the AAP class and gen ed. When they opened advanced math to more kids there were a ton of gen ed kids who easily made it and did the work just fine.