Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?
If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?
If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?
How about saying "undocumented" instead? When you get down to it the distinction is whether or not they have a birth certificate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?
If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?
Semantics matter
Never read dystopian literature?
Never studied history?
Stop using logic and common sense. You are supposed to only feel about the issue. Do not use your mind so that you can be triggered to protest against our great nation enforcing its laws.Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?
If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?
If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?
How about saying "undocumented" instead? When you get down to it the distinction is whether or not they have a birth certificate.
Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?
If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?
Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?
If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is this basic message getting lost in the current news?
It's not "getting lost". It's that a vast majority of Americans don't actually buy it.
Nearly every country has a border that they enforce.
-Never voted for Trump
A lie or you actually can't vote here
So your thesis is that everyone who has never voted for Trump thinks the USA should have ope n bo rders?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is this basic message getting lost in the current news?
It's not "getting lost". It's that a vast majority of Americans don't actually buy it.
Nearly every country has a border that they enforce.
-Never voted for Trump
A lie or you actually can't vote here
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is this basic message getting lost in the current news?
It's not "getting lost". It's that a vast majority of Americans don't actually buy it.
Nearly every country has a border that they enforce.
-Never voted for Trump
Anonymous wrote:Why is this basic message getting lost in the current news?