Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess they voted for Trump to be their king! Bunch of pussy men who gave away their freedom. But, rn, American white men are weak sycophants who have daddy issues.
This is exactly the story of rhetoric that got us here
More people voted for Trump than Harris. Should we just get rid of democracy and let you pick out leaders?
Anonymous wrote:The courts didn't do this, the voters did.
What do you think would be different if Trump wasn't immune to criminal liability for his official acts?
States still can't go after him. Congress won't go after him. The courts will still be doing exactly what they're doing now.
It's far more useful to view Trump as a reaction to the woke left driving away moderates from the Democratic tent. We lost the working class and unions to trump. Think about that.
A little bit of self reflection is in order. And we should put the far left wing of our party back in the corner. We need to triangulate to the center like Clinton rather than respond to far right antics with far left antics.
Anonymous wrote:The court doesn't exist to make people happier or to re-hinge unhinged politicians. It is there to interpret the laws as written. If there are problems with those laws, then Congress needs to address those problems. This is a problem with Congress, not a problem with the court.
Anonymous wrote:I guess they voted for Trump to be their king! Bunch of pussy men who gave away their freedom. But, rn, American white men are weak sycophants who have daddy issues.
Anonymous wrote:The court doesn't exist to make people happier or to re-hinge unhinged politicians. It is there to interpret the laws as written. If there are problems with those laws, then Congress needs to address those problems. This is a problem with Congress, not a problem with the court.
Anonymous wrote:What did Alexander Hamilton do when the government of England was unbearable?