Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No chores for money.
Chores = being a part of the family
Weekly Allowance = being part of the family
It's not a good idea- we did try paying for chores once and DS started to think that anything he did around the house was a transaction. It taught the wrong values.
What are the right values? Because I’m pretty sure you wouldn’t go to work if you didn’t get paid for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No chores for money.
Chores = being a part of the family
Weekly Allowance = being part of the family
It's not a good idea- we did try paying for chores once and DS started to think that anything he did around the house was a transaction. It taught the wrong values.
What are the right values? Because I’m pretty sure you wouldn’t go to work if you didn’t get paid for it.
Anonymous wrote:Jeez people took this as the opportunity to be sanctimonious. You know it is possible for your child to both have chores they have to do AND to have ways for them to work more and make more money. If they want to clean the whole house for $20, why in the world wouldn't you encourage that motivation and work ethic if you can afford the $20
Anonymous wrote:We don't pay for chores - we all do chores as part of the family/household
Anonymous wrote:No chores for money.
Chores = being a part of the family
Weekly Allowance = being part of the family
It's not a good idea- we did try paying for chores once and DS started to think that anything he did around the house was a transaction. It taught the wrong values.