Anonymous
Post 04/12/2025 15:34     Subject: Re:Australian with work visa deported
Here's a letter to the editor in an Australian newspaper by someone who flew Australia --->Hong Kong --->JFK to a cruise in Florida and they were sent back to Australia without any evidence of anything except that they flew through Asia.

Anonymous
Post 04/12/2025 14:55     Subject: Australian with work visa deported
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Now they're deporting Australians. Why???

Nothing makes sense.

Also, where does Kristi Noem find all the sadists?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/11/australian-with-us-working-visa-detained-insulted-deported


The article doesn't say why his visa was canceled, but does contain a fair amount of unsubstantiated quotations that beg credulity (as if they were enhanced by The Guardian article author).

Also, in a decision on Bourfa v. Mayorkas, the court unanimously affirmed the secretary’s discretion to cancel approved immigration petitions “for what he deems to be good and sufficient cause” under 8 United States Code (USC) §1155, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson delivering the court’s opinion.

They don't "beg credulity" at all. You're a moron living in denial.


PP, I don’t disagree with your assessment, but I fear that poster is more than that. I really think someone from the administration — or perhaps from a pro-Trump think tank — has, as part of their job, the duty to monitor DCUM and post here. Do we really think the typical DCUM poster would be citing Mayorkas and the USC off the top like that? This person is U.S. based, is probably an lawyer, and has a specific style which is pretty recognizable.


I am the least likely conspiracy theorist around and I have been thinking exactly this!


Why would they waste time here arguing on DCUM when they have the White House and Congress?

Seems like some folks don't like having their opinions challenged
Anonymous
Post 04/12/2025 13:36     Subject: Australian with work visa deported
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Now they're deporting Australians. Why???

Nothing makes sense.

Also, where does Kristi Noem find all the sadists?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/11/australian-with-us-working-visa-detained-insulted-deported


The article doesn't say why his visa was canceled, but does contain a fair amount of unsubstantiated quotations that beg credulity (as if they were enhanced by The Guardian article author).

Also, in a decision on Bourfa v. Mayorkas, the court unanimously affirmed the secretary’s discretion to cancel approved immigration petitions “for what he deems to be good and sufficient cause” under 8 United States Code (USC) §1155, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson delivering the court’s opinion.

They don't "beg credulity" at all. You're a moron living in denial.


PP, I don’t disagree with your assessment, but I fear that poster is more than that. I really think someone from the administration — or perhaps from a pro-Trump think tank — has, as part of their job, the duty to monitor DCUM and post here. Do we really think the typical DCUM poster would be citing Mayorkas and the USC off the top like that? This person is U.S. based, is probably an lawyer, and has a specific style which is pretty recognizable.


I am the least likely conspiracy theorist around and I have been thinking exactly this!
Anonymous
Post 04/12/2025 08:53     Subject: Australian with work visa deported
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Now they're deporting Australians. Why???

Nothing makes sense.

Also, where does Kristi Noem find all the sadists?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/11/australian-with-us-working-visa-detained-insulted-deported


The article doesn't say why his visa was canceled, but does contain a fair amount of unsubstantiated quotations that beg credulity (as if they were enhanced by The Guardian article author).

Also, in a decision on Bourfa v. Mayorkas, the court unanimously affirmed the secretary’s discretion to cancel approved immigration petitions “for what he deems to be good and sufficient cause” under 8 United States Code (USC) §1155, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson delivering the court’s opinion.


The article doesn't say why because he wasn't given a reason.

Why would we trust that there is good and sufficient cause?


Has he asked by challenging the revocation? If he did or said any
Anonymous
Post 04/12/2025 07:04     Subject: Re:Australian with work visa deported
Anonymous wrote:Why would he bring home the "empty ashes urn?"

This does not ring true.


It sounds like the Jasmine Mooney story, so I’m not sure why you think it doesn’t ring true.
Anonymous
Post 04/12/2025 06:53     Subject: Re:Australian with work visa deported
Why would he bring home the "empty ashes urn?"

This does not ring true.
Anonymous
Post 04/12/2025 06:30     Subject: Australian with work visa deported
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Now they're deporting Australians. Why???

Nothing makes sense.

Also, where does Kristi Noem find all the sadists?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/11/australian-with-us-working-visa-detained-insulted-deported


The article doesn't say why his visa was canceled, but does contain a fair amount of unsubstantiated quotations that beg credulity (as if they were enhanced by The Guardian article author).

Also, in a decision on Bourfa v. Mayorkas, the court unanimously affirmed the secretary’s discretion to cancel approved immigration petitions “for what he deems to be good and sufficient cause” under 8 United States Code (USC) §1155, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson delivering the court’s opinion.

They don't "beg credulity" at all. You're a moron living in denial.


PP, I don’t disagree with your assessment, but I fear that poster is more than that. I really think someone from the administration — or perhaps from a pro-Trump think tank — has, as part of their job, the duty to monitor DCUM and post here. Do we really think the typical DCUM poster would be citing Mayorkas and the USC off the top like that? This person is U.S. based, is probably an lawyer, and has a specific style which is pretty recognizable.
Anonymous
Post 04/12/2025 06:05     Subject: Australian with work visa deported
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Now they're deporting Australians. Why???

Nothing makes sense.

Also, where does Kristi Noem find all the sadists?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/11/australian-with-us-working-visa-detained-insulted-deported


The article doesn't say why his visa was canceled, but does contain a fair amount of unsubstantiated quotations that beg credulity (as if they were enhanced by The Guardian article author).

Also, in a decision on Bourfa v. Mayorkas, the court unanimously affirmed the secretary’s discretion to cancel approved immigration petitions “for what he deems to be good and sufficient cause” under 8 United States Code (USC) §1155, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson delivering the court’s opinion.

They don't "beg credulity" at all. You're a moron living in denial.
Anonymous
Post 04/12/2025 02:55     Subject: Australian with work visa deported
These people need to hire lawyers. I would contribute to a gofundme.
Anonymous
Post 04/12/2025 01:12     Subject: Australian with work visa deported
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Now they're deporting Australians. Why???

Nothing makes sense.

Also, where does Kristi Noem find all the sadists?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/11/australian-with-us-working-visa-detained-insulted-deported


The article doesn't say why his visa was canceled, but does contain a fair amount of unsubstantiated quotations that beg credulity (as if they were enhanced by The Guardian article author).

Also, in a decision on Bourfa v. Mayorkas, the court unanimously affirmed the secretary’s discretion to cancel approved immigration petitions “for what he deems to be good and sufficient cause” under 8 United States Code (USC) §1155, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson delivering the court’s opinion.


The article doesn't say why because he wasn't given a reason.

Why would we trust that there is good and sufficient cause?
Anonymous
Post 04/12/2025 00:00     Subject: Re:Australian with work visa deported
he probably has brown skin. That’s all he needed to have
Anonymous
Post 04/11/2025 22:36     Subject: Re:Australian with work visa deported
Wow this is insane. If they’re treating Australians like this, I can’t imagine how the non-western folks are being treated.
Anonymous
Post 04/11/2025 21:38     Subject: Australian with work visa deported
Anonymous wrote:Now they're deporting Australians. Why???

Nothing makes sense.

Also, where does Kristi Noem find all the sadists?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/11/australian-with-us-working-visa-detained-insulted-deported


The article doesn't say why his visa was canceled, but does contain a fair amount of unsubstantiated quotations that beg credulity (as if they were enhanced by The Guardian article author).

Also, in a decision on Bourfa v. Mayorkas, the court unanimously affirmed the secretary’s discretion to cancel approved immigration petitions “for what he deems to be good and sufficient cause” under 8 United States Code (USC) §1155, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson delivering the court’s opinion.
Anonymous
Post 04/11/2025 21:38     Subject: Australian with work visa deported
This is terrible. He had all the right papers.

No foreigner in their right mind would come here now.
Anonymous
Post 04/11/2025 21:04     Subject: Australian with work visa deported
Now they're deporting Australians. Why???

Nothing makes sense.

Also, where does Kristi Noem find all the sadists?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/11/australian-with-us-working-visa-detained-insulted-deported