Anonymous wrote:Colleges have caught on to mcps’s grade inflation and that reputation is hurting our students’ future outcomes.
Yet, parents and students push and push and push for grades, abuse of the 50% rule, etc.
The current grading system deters motivation for quarter 2 and quarter 4.
(Guess what I do lol).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn't sound like they have annoucned how it might change. I didn't realize from the other thread that one option was just to weight the second and fourth quarters higher than the first and third.
That's how it used to be. It was referred to as trend. A/B = B while B/A = A.
That’s not what they are considering doing. They are considering doing a numerical average of both marking periods within the semester. So if you got a 96 MP1 and an 89 MP2, you’d average out to an A for the semester despite the trend downward.
They are still developing the plan. Stay tuned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn't sound like they have annoucned how it might change. I didn't realize from the other thread that one option was just to weight the second and fourth quarters higher than the first and third.
That's how it used to be. It was referred to as trend. A/B = B while B/A = A.
That’s not what they are considering doing. They are considering doing a numerical average of both marking periods within the semester. So if you got a 96 MP1 and an 89 MP2, you’d average out to an A for the semester despite the trend downward.
They are still developing the plan. Stay tuned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why not just use the numeric course average to determine that?
Or just have the gradebook go for the entire semester.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn't sound like they have annoucned how it might change. I didn't realize from the other thread that one option was just to weight the second and fourth quarters higher than the first and third.
That's how it used to be. It was referred to as trend. A/B = B while B/A = A.
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't sound like they have annoucned how it might change. I didn't realize from the other thread that one option was just to weight the second and fourth quarters higher than the first and third.
Anonymous wrote:Why not just use the numeric course average to determine that?
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't sound like they have annoucned how it might change. I didn't realize from the other thread that one option was just to weight the second and fourth quarters higher than the first and third.