was it also tax deductible?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If Yale wants to admit wealthy people, they should simply put the slots up for bidding by the highest bidderAnonymous wrote:Who cares. Wealthy people get nicer things. Nicer homes, nicer cars, nicer vacations, nicer educations.
It’s not “inequitable” that my friend has a beach house and I don’t or that she can afford Yale and I can’t.
My Dad says that at his Yale 25th reunion they did just that - as a fundraiser. It was 1982.
Anonymous wrote:If Yale wants to admit wealthy people, they should simply put the slots up for bidding by the highest bidderAnonymous wrote:Who cares. Wealthy people get nicer things. Nicer homes, nicer cars, nicer vacations, nicer educations.
It’s not “inequitable” that my friend has a beach house and I don’t or that she can afford Yale and I can’t.
lol which one has better results?Anonymous wrote:No. How much you spend on it doesn't matter. You can spend a million on your kid's football training, or have his come up through an inner city football program. You can spend a fortune on film equipment and camps or you can send your kid to the free film course in the city. And so on.
If Yale wants to admit wealthy people, they should simply put the slots up for bidding by the highest bidderAnonymous wrote:Who cares. Wealthy people get nicer things. Nicer homes, nicer cars, nicer vacations, nicer educations.
It’s not “inequitable” that my friend has a beach house and I don’t or that she can afford Yale and I can’t.