Anonymous wrote:It’s crazy to validate voters? Yeah, no it’s not. If there’s nothing to hide I do not see a problem. JFC.

Agree completely.

First off, the ballots should be excluded as they were cast by voters who were not properly registered because they did not provide their state driver's license numbers or Social Security numbers as a 2004 state law required.

Second, for all anybody knows, all 60k ballots could be for the republican candidate. You don’t know.

This case is a matter of ballot integrity. Do you want integrity or fraud?

Anonymous wrote:Hey I found some voter fraud in North Carolina! Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows was registered to vote in two states including in Virginia and a mobile home in North Carolina his wife rented for two months - but he never visited - that he listed as his home. But voter fraud doesn’t count when republicans do it!

https://www.cbs17.com/news/former-trump-chief-meadows-nc-voter-registration-in-question/amp/

Old news.

Hey I found some voter fraud in North Carolina! Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows was registered to vote in two states including in Virginia and a mobile home in North Carolina his wife rented for two months - but he never visited - that he listed as his home. But voter fraud doesn’t count when republicans do it!

https://www.cbs17.com/news/former-trump-chief-meadows-nc-voter-registration-in-question/amp/

Anonymous wrote:It’s crazy to validate voters? Yeah, no it’s not. If there’s nothing to hide I do not see a problem. JFC.

The voters already validated their identity when they registered to vote; there is no reason they need to revalidate every single time they vote.

Be careful what you wish for. When I lived in the Middle East, I was prohibited from purchasing an iPhone, for which I planned to pay cash and therefore did not require credit or anything, at one of the main TCOM providers because my signature did not EXACTLY match the signature on my passport and other IDs. In reality, they did not want to give me the phone because I was a woman and my husband was not with me when I attempted to make the purchase.

What are you going to do when they deny your voter registration because your signature does not exactly match?

If you think there is fraud in NC voting then you don’t live in NC and you haven’t voted. We lived in VA and moved to NC a couple of years ago. NC has an elaborate process you go through when you vote to prevent fraud.

This is all an attempt to overturn an election which Allison Riggs won. It’s sour grapes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These people are just anti-freedom to their core. Republican judges did a favor for the Republican who lost the race and a recount. Third mulligan for the Republican?

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/north-carolina-judges-open-door-tossing-60000-ballots-high-court-race-2025-04-04/

Get use to it. The Republican do believe in the constitution or democracy.

No. They absolutely do not. Everything they have done of late shows the absolute opposite. They abdicate Congress's congressionally mandated responsibility of oversight over the Executive for one.

Anonymous wrote:These 65000 voters can provide their drivers license or social security number as originally required. The NC Republicans on the court went out of their way to not throw out deficient ballots.

This would hold up as an argument only if they did the same thing for every race where a Republican won.

Anonymous wrote:These people are just anti-freedom to their core. Republican judges did a favor for the Republican who lost the race and a recount. Third mulligan for the Republican?

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/north-carolina-judges-open-door-tossing-60000-ballots-high-court-race-2025-04-04/

Get use to it. The Republican do believe in the constitution or democracy.

Anonymous wrote:It’s crazy to validate voters? Yeah, no it’s not. If there’s nothing to hide I do not see a problem. JFC.

Oh come on. Knock it off with your BS strawmen, nobody is "hiding" anything and there are already many checks and balances in place to stop voter fraud. But what you are doing is being completely ignorant and obtuse to the reality of things like ACTUAL legislation that Republicans are trying to push at state levels, for example insisting that voter registrations match birth certificates. For a woman who changed her name when she married, that will be a major problem. Along with the bills putting excessive burden on LEGAL voters, purging legal voters from rolls, and so on. Republicans are doing everything possible to disenfranchise LEGAL voters.

Anonymous wrote:These 65000 voters can provide their drivers license or social security number as originally required. The NC Republicans on the court went out of their way to not throw out deficient ballots.

If this is the law, then what's the problem?

Anonymous wrote:These people are just anti-freedom to their core. Republican judges did a favor for the Republican who lost the race and a recount. Third mulligan for the Republican?

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/north-carolina-judges-open-door-tossing-60000-ballots-high-court-race-2025-04-04/

What would Governor Tryon think? Time to bring the capitol back to New Bern.

These 65000 voters can provide their drivers license or social security number as originally required. The NC Republicans on the court went out of their way to not throw out deficient ballots.

It’s crazy to validate voters? Yeah, no it’s not. If there’s nothing to hide I do not see a problem. JFC.

Thank you for bringing this up, this story is CRAZY.

These people are just anti-freedom to their core. Republican judges did a favor for the Republican who lost the race and a recount. Third mulligan for the Republican?

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/north-carolina-judges-open-door-tossing-60000-ballots-high-court-race-2025-04-04/