Anonymous wrote:I don’t know what to tell you, but no amount of desperate questions on this board are going to crack the admissions code nor reveal that getting a certain award will indicate a certain path through admissions.
There’s no magic answer and that’s incredibly uncomfortable, but everyone obsessing over who has the right formula or who gets in with what is wasting time that they could spend actually living their life in an authentic way.
Anonymous wrote:My DS got into Harvard REA in December. Today we were invited to a reception for admits and their family that the local Harvard Club is hosting next Saturday. I am astonished by what many of these kids have accomplished across diverse disciplines. One general truism is that their EC stories are sufficiently unique that if you really knew what they were doing, they would essentially be publicly declaring themselves (confirming the idea that high stats are table stakes for entry, necessary but not sufficient).
Anonymous wrote:As a Yale grad who got into HYS, and married a similar combo and who mostly has friends who have some connection to those institutions and now is spending a lot of time with current students there, I would say that what you’re describing is more of an aberration. I see fewer kids who are doing a laundry list of things well as was more common in the late 90s or early 2000sx and instead see kids who are doing 1-2 interesting things, have solid GPAs and crazy test scores. But the real differentiator is that they have something about the way they interact with people, talk about themselves and their plans, and think and talk about ideas and other people. That’s what makes them stand out. This isn’t a good analogy, but you talk to these kids or some of my fellow alumni and it’s like seeing something in 3D and comparing it to the same thing in 2D.
Also stuff like book awards are typically chosen by the principal or guidance counselor or a local alum, so it’s meaningless to the institution to which you’re applying. And superintendents awards are an equally passive, meaningless thing. Colleges don’t actually care.
Anonymous wrote:I disagree that the book awards are meaningless. I don't know how the Yale alum is involved in admissions - or if they even are - but you'll see it time and again, the recipients of these awards go to the top schools. The teachers and administration of the high schools are helping identify stars. I'm assuming that's the goal of the award. I believe the Dartmouth award states it explicitly.
Anonymous wrote:As a Yale grad who got into HYS, and married a similar combo and who mostly has friends who have some connection to those institutions and now is spending a lot of time with current students there, I would say that what you’re describing is more of an aberration. I see fewer kids who are doing a laundry list of things well as was more common in the late 90s or early 2000sx and instead see kids who are doing 1-2 interesting things, have solid GPAs and crazy test scores. But the real differentiator is that they have something about the way they interact with people, talk about themselves and their plans, and think and talk about ideas and other people. That’s what makes them stand out. This isn’t a good analogy, but you talk to these kids or some of my fellow alumni and it’s like seeing something in 3D and comparing it to the same thing in 2D.
Also stuff like book awards are typically chosen by the principal or guidance counselor or a local alum, so it’s meaningless to the institution to which you’re applying. And superintendents awards are an equally passive, meaningless thing. Colleges don’t actually care.
Anonymous wrote:Some not as impressive, but they have crazy connections (including legacy), or they were recruited.
Anonymous wrote:Some not as impressive, but they have crazy connections (including legacy), or they were recruited.