Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a tax on speech.
No, it is not. Money is exchanged for goods or services. Money is not communication.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this would be constitutional (although, really, are we even following the Constitution anymore?) but Democrats should propose and run on a progressive excise tax on political and dark money contributions. I suggest a schedule as such:
0% up to $2,500
100% from $2,500-10,000
500% from $10,000 to $1 million
1,000% $1 million and above.
That would solve a lot of problems with money in politics and help reduce the deficit.
Are you a trumper? You must be. Because you’re proposing a great idea for eliminating Democrat’s largest and most important donors.![]()
And if you’re NOT a trumper, you’re just really friggin stupid, then.
Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this would be constitutional (although, really, are we even following the Constitution anymore?) but Democrats should propose and run on a progressive excise tax on political and dark money contributions. I suggest a schedule as such:
0% up to $2,500
100% from $2,500-10,000
500% from $10,000 to $1 million
1,000% $1 million and above.
That would solve a lot of problems with money in politics and help reduce the deficit.
Anonymous wrote:This is a tax on speech.
Anonymous wrote:Congress has wide flexibility to implement taxes under the constitution. I’m not sure that an excise tax specifically targeted at political donations would be constitutional. However, Congress could change the tax laws to make 501(c)4 organizations recognize donations as taxable income and make lobbying a non deductible expense for these organizations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this would be constitutional (although, really, are we even following the Constitution anymore?) but Democrats should propose and run on a progressive excise tax on political and dark money contributions. I suggest a schedule as such:
0% up to $2,500
100% from $2,500-10,000
500% from $10,000 to $1 million
1,000% $1 million and above.
That would solve a lot of problems with money in politics and help reduce the deficit.
Democrats would never go for that.
Anonymous wrote:Congress has wide flexibility to implement taxes under the constitution. I’m not sure that an excise tax specifically targeted at political donations would be constitutional. However, Congress could change the tax laws to make 501(c)4 organizations recognize donations as taxable income and make lobbying a non deductible expense for these organizations.
Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this would be constitutional (although, really, are we even following the Constitution anymore?) but Democrats should propose and run on a progressive excise tax on political and dark money contributions. I suggest a schedule as such:
0% up to $2,500
100% from $2,500-10,000
500% from $10,000 to $1 million
1,000% $1 million and above.
That would solve a lot of problems with money in politics and help reduce the deficit.