Anonymous wrote:If you read my post, then you know that there's been a lot of discussion within the Tufts community -- of which I am a member -- about the *university's* response to this incident. A petition that had 1500+ signers as of last night (not me). I am not *singling out* Tufts -- I am echoing posts by, say, Columbia grads, which *you* allowed for pages and pages *in the college forum*, to discuss the Columbia administration's response to student activism. You seem to have a double standard here, and I am not sure why, but my intentions are to provide prospective parents -- and fellow Tufts community members on DCUM -- with the same kind of discussion as you provided the Columbia community over the past year. My sticking point is with *your* burying the topic and insisting that it is purely political despite *not* holding the same standard to similar discussions of activity at other universities and colleges. But, as you often note, it's your private website & you can do as you see fit. I'm just disappointed in you -- which is why I didn't drop it, honestly. Sucks to have your heroes be human after all!
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:She was detained by the government, not by the university. The university can do anything about it, the government can. It is completely a political issue.
OP again - why was the Columbia activism thread in >>colleges then? How is this different? If I spoke of Tufts admin policies as relates to this issue would it merit a >>colleges thread or not?
Tufts students tell me that they find it ironic that President Kumar suggested in his letter to the community (which has been widely reported) that international students who fear for their safety due to ICE or other threats immediately call TUPD, given that many pro-Palestine protestors allege TUPD misconduct:
[url]https://www.tuftsdaily.com/article/2024/03/students-allege-police-aggression-at-nov-17-protest-for-palestine
[/url]
There are over a million threads on this site. You can't expect total consistency among all of them. I explained why I moved your thread. But it's late and I am not going to spend the evening debating all the other threads.
Anonymous wrote:Not newsworthy, huh? You can see from my posting history that I am a longtime community member, and am not a troll. I have been a helpful, informative DCUM member for decades. I am really surprised that you are suppressing info about this situation. Immediate deletion of the post about the Tufts petition, which cites 2 newspapers? Wow, I am honestly surprised. I have respected you very much over the years and this honestly stings. I have always wished you the best with this business and am hoping that you are trying to protect your business interests and not, in fact, just suppressing speech you disagree with.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:She was detained by the government, not by the university. The university can do anything about it, the government can. It is completely a political issue.
OP again - why was the Columbia activism thread in >>colleges then? How is this different? If I spoke of Tufts admin policies as relates to this issue would it merit a >>colleges thread or not?
Tufts students tell me that they find it ironic that President Kumar suggested in his letter to the community (which has been widely reported) that international students who fear for their safety due to ICE or other threats immediately call TUPD, given that many pro-Palestine protestors allege TUPD misconduct:
[url]https://www.tuftsdaily.com/article/2024/03/students-allege-police-aggression-at-nov-17-protest-for-palestine
[/url]
jsteele wrote:She was detained by the government, not by the university. The university can do anything about it, the government can. It is completely a political issue.