The war on the judiciary needs to stop. The Trump administration are such monsters.

I think they used AI to write it and didn't proofread the document thoroughly before submitting it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The DOJ will lose this.

Yes, they will. I'm a bit puzzled why they are even doing this. Does someone at DOJ actually think this is a winning strategy? If they know that it isn't (which they should, since it isn't), why are they doing it?

The strategy is the same one Trump has always used in his legal fights — delay, delay, delay, do what you want in the meantime.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The DOJ will lose this.

Yes, they will. I'm a bit puzzled why they are even doing this. Does someone at DOJ actually think this is a winning strategy? If they know that it isn't (which they should, since it isn't), why are they doing it?

Puzzelled?/
SCOTUS gave Trump immunity.
They want all cases to go to SCOTUS that is the plan
They are hoping for back to state courts like in the NC voting case heard yesterday or SCOTUS handing them wins.

Our courts system is very slow too slow. No sanctions or contempt have been given to these lawyers that should have been disbarred.

Eastman is about to get his law license back.
They own the 5th & 9th Circuit.

Johnson said yesterday "federal courts are not needed"

Get it now Constitution be dammed our laws be dammed we voted in King Don the Con Dictator.

This is not going to end well for one American not one.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The DOJ will lose this.

Yes, they will. I'm a bit puzzled why they are even doing this. Does someone at DOJ actually think this is a winning strategy? If they know that it isn't (which they should, since it isn't), why are they doing it?

Where have you been for the past 9 years?

They know they are wrong so they lie.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The DOJ will lose this.

Yes, they will. I'm a bit puzzled why they are even doing this. Does someone at DOJ actually think this is a winning strategy? If they know that it isn't (which they should, since it isn't), why are they doing it?

I’m also confused by this. But like many other things, part of this is normalizing what was previously abnormal (attacking judges, using highly political language, calling for impeachment, coyly pretending to not understand court orders). They are constantly pushing the bounds of what is expected. That in itself is degrading to our democracy and our rule of law, they know it. They may have a low win rate but they are still doing damage in the meantime.

Anonymous wrote:The DOJ will lose this.

Yes, they will. I'm a bit puzzled why they are even doing this. Does someone at DOJ actually think this is a winning strategy? If they know that it isn't (which they should, since it isn't), why are they doing it?

The DOJ will lose this.

They said the quiet part out loud. 😂 She’s not partial to them, so she’s “tainted” by impartiality. She’s also unduly influenced by the Constitution and temperamentally unfit to be a judge because of her stubborn adherence to the rule of law.

Why they earned the name Stupid Watergate

In reality, Bondi and DOJ are the tainted ones.

The tone that DOJ has been using in these high-profile filings has been a striking change. Highly inflammatory, not too fussed about accuracy or the law, and downright rude. I think I have figured out where it is coming from. The name is right at the top on this one.

Haha excellent catch.

First sentence of a motion to recuse:

"Fair proceedings free from any suggestion of impartiality are essential to the integrity of
our country’s judiciary and the need to curtail ongoing improper encroachments of President
Trump’s Executive Power playing out across the country."

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.278290/gov.uscourts.dcd.278290.34.0_2.pdf