Anonymous wrote:already a thread on this.
I am still wondering why the press hasn't made a bigger deal about this moment which reveals either: bald-faced lying, dementia, or not being in charge at all.
Anonymous wrote:[i]WH said "obviously" he was referring to the original act signed in 1798.[b] Was Marco handling it all then too?
Anonymous wrote:This is very good news. It means that at least for now he doesn’t want to push the “I don’t care about court orders” and cause a constitutional crisis. For now.
I am assuming that on this issue, he is hearing from prominent Rs not to go there. One can hope, right? Anyone have scoop?
So let’s mark this down as a win. For now.