Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Incluing $358 million for schools (combined for DCPS and charter) in the middle of the school year. This is devastating and enraging. What chances does this have of actually going through?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2025/03/09/dc-budget-congress-house-republicans-continuing-resolution/
Same thing will happen to every city and state. Look at Texas 33% of the budget comes from the Feds. That will be cut.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Incluing $358 million for schools (combined for DCPS and charter) in the middle of the school year. This is devastating and enraging. What chances does this have of actually going through?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2025/03/09/dc-budget-congress-house-republicans-continuing-resolution/
Same thing will happen to every city and state. Look at Texas 33% of the budget comes from the Feds. That will be cut.
Anonymous wrote:Incluing $358 million for schools (combined for DCPS and charter) in the middle of the school year. This is devastating and enraging. What chances does this have of actually going through?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2025/03/09/dc-budget-congress-house-republicans-continuing-resolution/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hopefully, unless the CR is written to include clarifying language that this does NOT effect DC's budget it won't get the 60+ votes that it needs in the Senate. (ie. it needs 7 Democrats in the Senate to vote yes assuming all Republicans do.)
The Democrats don't care either. We are on our own as always.
Wish Bowser had made the hard budget decision of cutting from the billions in new spending that have been added over the last few years before it came to this.
What does this mean??
It means that spending was greatly expanded since the pandemic. This was largely done on the back of pandemic and IRA grants that reduced the cost of some of that spending.
Yet while the costs were reduced at the time the programs implemented often created long term spending obligations. The various health care, housing, school and transportation expenditures for example.
We have known for quite some time now that that new spending was unsustainable and that the post-pandemic bill was coming due. Had we been more proactive about cutting our budget then we wouldn't be needing to scramble now. We need the rainy day fund that we drew down when things were good.
TLDR: Trump sucks but we could never afford to be as generous as the Council has been recently. Free IVF, free housing, free food, etc
Anonymous wrote:It makes little sense, and it’s still unclear why it is in there. These are not federal funds. DC balances its budget.
It seems only in there to punish DC. Or it’s a bizarre mistake.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hopefully, unless the CR is written to include clarifying language that this does NOT effect DC's budget it won't get the 60+ votes that it needs in the Senate. (ie. it needs 7 Democrats in the Senate to vote yes assuming all Republicans do.)
The Democrats don't care either. We are on our own as always.
Wish Bowser had made the hard budget decision of cutting from the billions in new spending that have been added over the last few years before it came to this.
What does this mean??
Anonymous wrote:People need to understand, this is not federal money. This is DC money. It would be like a governor approving a budget for a city where all of the dollars in the budget are generated in the city.
This is part of the problem with the current structure. the GOP has zero stake in this and can completely degrade the quality of life of DC residents without a care or repercussion.
This impacts DC Fire, Metropolitan Police, the money that goes to providing a rich transit system for tourists, clean streets, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hopefully, unless the CR is written to include clarifying language that this does NOT effect DC's budget it won't get the 60+ votes that it needs in the Senate. (ie. it needs 7 Democrats in the Senate to vote yes assuming all Republicans do.)
The Democrats don't care either. We are on our own as always.
Wish Bowser had made the hard budget decision of cutting from the billions in new spending that have been added over the last few years before it came to this.
Anonymous wrote:Hopefully, unless the CR is written to include clarifying language that this does NOT effect DC's budget it won't get the 60+ votes that it needs in the Senate. (ie. it needs 7 Democrats in the Senate to vote yes assuming all Republicans do.)