LOL. Yes, you could. GLAnonymous wrote:OP here. Known private/feeder in NYC. But classes are small so naviance data isn't robust.
Dartmouth is the one school that hasn't really taken any kids with a 3.8 (except a couple w 3.6ish - I assume athletes). So they don't seem willing to look past a 3.8. Which is fine.
We'll have our first 1-1 college counselor meeting in a month . Just want to start thinking.
The "one over the others" is Williams, but I think that's tough. He doesn't want to do Midd febs entry, and I don't think he'll have to. So in my mind that's the range: reach (Williams) and safety( Midd Febs) . But I could be wrong
Anonymous wrote:Of that group, best shot is ED1 to Midd and say you'll take the Feb start. (And if you get dinged, internalize the feedback, realize you aren't going to be admitted to any of the others, and ED2 down a level or two of selectivity. Colby or, especially, Bates would almost certainly take a high stats, full-pay, humanities boy in ED2, for example.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of that group, best shot is ED1 to Midd and say you'll take the Feb start. (And if you get dinged, internalize the feedback, realize you aren't going to be admitted to any of the others, and ED2 down a level or two of selectivity. Colby or, especially, Bates would almost certainly take a high stats, full-pay, humanities boy in ED2, for example.)
3.8 from a good private can do better than Bates. Unless you want Bates.
Anonymous wrote:Of that group, best shot is ED1 to Midd and say you'll take the Feb start. (And if you get dinged, internalize the feedback, realize you aren't going to be admitted to any of the others, and ED2 down a level or two of selectivity. Colby or, especially, Bates would almost certainly take a high stats, full-pay, humanities boy in ED2, for example.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think ED is critical, plus school relationships/patterns, plus if there are recruited athletes going to these schools from his class.
I think those factors will matter most but they make it hard for us to speculate.
Can he come up with a specific reason for one of the SLACS over the others? If so I suggest ED’ing there.
yes, this is important. You need to figure out who is recruited or legacy from the class. If there are 2 athletic recruits or legacy applicants from his class he's likely not getting a Bowdoin (for example) spot. If he's the solo applicant then it might happen. So much of doing ED from a private high school to a smallish college is figuring out who else is applying from your school.
Anonymous wrote:I think ED is critical, plus school relationships/patterns, plus if there are recruited athletes going to these schools from his class.
I think those factors will matter most but they make it hard for us to speculate.
Can he come up with a specific reason for one of the SLACS over the others? If so I suggest ED’ing there.
Anonymous wrote:full pay male, humanities, 1530 SAT
hoping for WASP, Midd, Dartmouth, Bowdoin
Our Naviance is not very telling, except for Dartmouth. They seem to really lean on GPA so that's out.
I can discount obvious outliers (mostly athletes), but does anyone know which of the above SLACs will care more about great LOR and compelling essays over ECs? He has really strong in-school ECs but not much out of school. But school leadership, for sure.