Anonymous wrote:the ranking is like:
1. type of appointment
2. veteran's preference
3. length of service
4. performance ratings
There's a specific calculation of how #3 and #4 work together to create the priority list somewhere online. I saw it but don't recall where (on a govt website). It doesn't matter much, though, since you don't actually know your peers' performance ratings.
Essentially, all veterans (regardless of length of service) are more prioritized than all non veterans. And then there is a prioritization within each category based on disability status (for veterans), length of service and ratings.
There are good videos on youtube that go into this in detail. They were just posted in the last month and there are several to choose from.
The biggest question that no one has the answer to yet is what is the "competitive area." That is, are they imposing a retention level across a full agency, or within your small office, or something in between. The answer to this is almost determinative of whether you'll be retained. (It's possible that some offices will be zeroed out and others not touched at all. Until we know that, no one really knows their likelihood of RIF.