Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you trying to ask if full pay applicants would have an advantage? That would involve colleges changing to need-aware.
Also note that some private school kids need financial aid and some public school kids are full pay.
This. It seems like you have a pretty reductive notion of public school kids.![]()
PP. I was simply trying to interpret OP's question. The only way OP's question made sense is if OP thinks private school kids are full pay and public are not. If OP is asking something else, then perhaps they should come back to clarify.
I have kids in both public and private high schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you trying to ask if full pay applicants would have an advantage? That would involve colleges changing to need-aware.
Also note that some private school kids need financial aid and some public school kids are full pay.
This. It seems like you have a pretty reductive notion of public school kids.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you trying to ask if full pay applicants would have an advantage? That would involve colleges changing to need-aware.
Also note that some private school kids need financial aid and some public school kids are full pay.
This. It seems like you have a pretty reductive notion of public school kids.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you trying to ask if full pay applicants would have an advantage? That would involve colleges changing to need-aware.
Also note that some private school kids need financial aid and some public school kids are full pay.
This. It seems like you have a pretty reductive notion of public school kids.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Are you trying to ask if full pay applicants would have an advantage? That would involve colleges changing to need-aware.
Also note that some private school kids need financial aid and some public school kids are full pay.