Anonymous wrote:Again, this simply isn't correct--there are tons of pay-for enrichments available on top of the regular aftercare at SWS.
Anonymous wrote: I mean enrichments outside/on top of the aftercare model like many other schools on the Hill now have (LT, CHML, VN at least). Like LT, for instance, offers like 50 different afterschool clubs. A few parents tried to bring this model to the principal and were completely shut down.
Anonymous wrote: I mean enrichments outside/on top of the aftercare model like many other schools on the Hill now have (LT, CHML, VN at least). Like LT, for instance, offers like 50 different afterschool clubs. A few parents tried to bring this model to the principal and were completely shut down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The SWS culture is kind of weird. The principal is an ideologue who seems to consider his mission in life to end racism. It comes through a lot, in everything the school does.
He also strikes me as a little bit dumb. Sorry!
Anonymous wrote:The SWS culture is kind of weird. The principal is an ideologue who seems to consider his mission in life to end racism. It comes through a lot, in everything the school does.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You need to be fine with the SWS way of doing things. They don't really tolerate input or dissent. For instance, the principal wouldn't add afterschool enrichment programming since not all kids would be able to afford it. (Didn't even get as far as seeing if parent group could subsidize; just a flat no.) I personally would choose Maury without hesitation.
What do you mean by afterschool enrichment? Current SWS parent here, we have Polite Piggys for aftercare, and they have afterschool enrichment programming with additional fees. What is more annoying is the lack of DCIAA sports teams, but that might not be an issue for some people.
Anonymous wrote:You need to be fine with the SWS way of doing things. They don't really tolerate input or dissent. For instance, the principal wouldn't add afterschool enrichment programming since not all kids would be able to afford it. (Didn't even get as far as seeing if parent group could subsidize; just a flat no.) I personally would choose Maury without hesitation.
Anonymous wrote:I've read elsewhere on this forum some parents concern with academics at SWS, particularly in the later years and their kids falling behind that of peer schools. Maury is more of a traditional approach to academics if that is what is important to you.
Personally, I'd choose Maury.