Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is evidence other than scientific evidence. Logical evidence, historical evidence, and more.

As for science, the fact that all of scientific history as shown exactly zero evidence of the supernatural is also a strong point of consideration.

For example, science has shown that lightning is not thrown by gods, as was once believed.

Scientific method limitations:
Science relies on observation and experimentation to test hypotheses, and the concept of God is typically not considered something that can be directly observed or manipulated in a lab.

God as a supernatural being, which falls outside the scope of scientific inquiry that focuses on the physical world.

There is no scientific way to definitively prove or disprove the existence of God.

God is not an object of science as there is no evidence of god in Nature for science to consider. In other words, statements about gods have no scientific content.

There isn't physical evidence that can be used to prove or disprove that God exists. This means that it wouldn't be scientific to claim that God does or doesn't exist. So to believe in God or not, is something we have to choose ourselves.

Anonymous wrote:I don't think my belief should be your belief. You do you, but keep your "unprovable" whatever out of my government and my kids' schools.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is evidence other than scientific evidence. Logical evidence, historical evidence, and more.

As for science, the fact that all of scientific history as shown exactly zero evidence of the supernatural is also a strong point of consideration.

For example, science has shown that lightning is not thrown by gods, as was once believed.

Scientific method limitations:
Science relies on observation and experimentation to test hypotheses, and the concept of God is typically not considered something that can be directly observed or manipulated in a lab.

God as a supernatural being, which falls outside the scope of scientific inquiry that focuses on the physical world.

There is no scientific way to definitively prove or disprove the existence of God.

God is not an object of science as there is no evidence of god in Nature for science to consider. In other words, statements about gods have no scientific content.

There isn't physical evidence that can be used to prove or disprove that God exists. This means that it wouldn't be scientific to claim that God does or doesn't exist. So to believe in God or not, is something we have to choose ourselves.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think people are drawn to finding common ground with others. It’s hard to have a serious conversation with someone who believes in supernatural forces.

That sounds like a you problem.

Various studies show that between 64%-71% of Americans believe in some type of supernatural phenomenon.

You enjoy talking to people who believe as you do, not very open minded and tolerant of you.

Anonymous wrote:Why do you keep creating new posts to try to argue points?

Anonymous wrote:Why do you keep creating new posts to try to argue points?

Anonymous wrote:Whether or not God exists is a matter of personal belief that cannot be proven scientifically.

Why do so many people declare that no God or gods exist?

Are such people arrogant or just ignorant?

If you don’t believe in God it gods, why do you think your personal beliefs should be the personal beliefs of everyone?

Anonymous wrote:I think people are drawn to finding common ground with others. It’s hard to have a serious conversation with someone who believes in supernatural forces.

Anonymous wrote:There is evidence other than scientific evidence. Logical evidence, historical evidence, and more.

As for science, the fact that all of scientific history as shown exactly zero evidence of the supernatural is also a strong point of consideration.

For example, science has shown that lightning is not thrown by gods, as was once believed.