Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The study that someone posted in other thread that is being used for future aap planning recommends eliminating parent involvement- so anything now more than sounds like will be in future when FCPS rolls out next changes. Starts with “P” for name of phd who is one of authors- not being cryptic here, just can’t remember name.
Does that mean eliminating appeals and parent referral? This sounds like a bad idea but not surprising they would coalesce around a bad idea.
Link to report below that someone else posted on other AAP thread 2 days ago (the in pool thread). Recommendation on parent referral is on page 42, item 2b and on appeals is 2f (my system won’t let me just copy and paste here). Recs are very general, but does put eyes on both. In short for appeals says need to be ready for those to go up if change admission process.
https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/BPLQKV69B096/$file/FCPS%20final%20report%2005.05.20.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Dc1 was in pool and got into aap without any parent referral ( had no idea what to submit). DC2 was in pool and got into aap ( did parent referral because child was in the classes with all kids having behavior problems for 2 years, even thought I still had no idea what to submit, at least l wouldn’t feel regret later if DC wasn’t in). Parent referral wouldn’t hurt and help especially when kids aren’t in pool.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The study that someone posted in other thread that is being used for future aap planning recommends eliminating parent involvement- so anything now more than sounds like will be in future when FCPS rolls out next changes. Starts with “P” for name of phd who is one of authors- not being cryptic here, just can’t remember name.
Does that mean eliminating appeals and parent referral? This sounds like a bad idea but not surprising they would coalesce around a bad idea.
Link to report below that someone else posted on other AAP thread 2 days ago (the in pool thread). Recommendation on parent referral is on page 42, item 2b and on appeals is 2f (my system won’t let me just copy and paste here). Recs are very general, but does put eyes on both. In short for appeals says need to be ready for those to go up if change admission process.
https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/BPLQKV69B096/$file/FCPS%20final%20report%2005.05.20.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The study that someone posted in other thread that is being used for future aap planning recommends eliminating parent involvement- so anything now more than sounds like will be in future when FCPS rolls out next changes. Starts with “P” for name of phd who is one of authors- not being cryptic here, just can’t remember name.
Does that mean eliminating appeals and parent referral? This sounds like a bad idea but not surprising they would coalesce around a bad idea.
Anonymous wrote:The study that someone posted in other thread that is being used for future aap planning recommends eliminating parent involvement- so anything now more than sounds like will be in future when FCPS rolls out next changes. Starts with “P” for name of phd who is one of authors- not being cryptic here, just can’t remember name.
Anonymous wrote:I wonder how closely they really look at everything in the packet. Between the parent referral, parent questionnaire, test scores, hope form, and work samples, there's a lot of papers to look at in a short amount of time. It gets even more arduous for them in the appeal with even more work samples. Despite what FCPS wants you to believe, these people are not experts on "giftedness" and I bet make plenty of incorrect snap judgments.