Anonymous wrote:There will always be conspiracy theories - science based or not.
With social media, it's much easier to convince others and spread.
There was a Harvard study that survied that 1 in 3 people are convinced aliens, posing as humans, live among us. The paper lacked evidence and not peer reviwed fwuw.
But you get the point
Anonymous wrote:FWIW, the original post reads like an AI chat to me.
I suspect that seeing differences as differences in style rather than differences in perspective or systems of belief is likely a limited understanding of the field itself and/or related to issues with flexible thinking and transferable skills.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks to the posters who gave so much thought to other fields besides religion that exhibit different beliefs within one framework.
I'd say Philosophy is the only one mentioned that really fits. The others - music, food, etc. reflect different tastes, that developed independently of each other, but not really different beliefs.
Also, it's not unusual and considered perfectly acceptable, for people to enjoy several types of music and cuisines once exposed to them. But you can have just one philosophy or religion at a time.
I think art easily qualifies as well - very divergent to beliefs about and forms of art.
Fashion probably qualifies as well - no consensus on what looks good
Meanwhile, It's OK to like different kinds of art and fashion at the same time. It's called being eclectic. So , in that way, they're different from religion which requires you to identify with a certain religion or not. Granted, some people may not want to identify with a particular religion or any religion, but their attitudes are not considered to be socially acceptable.
Anonymous wrote:Some philosophers and mathematician s think we live in a simulation. They can offer up evidence for this belief. Others disagree and can also offer proof.
Music, well there are tons. You have death metal and Kpop very different beliefs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks to the posters who gave so much thought to other fields besides religion that exhibit different beliefs within one framework.
I'd say Philosophy is the only one mentioned that really fits. The others - music, food, etc. reflect different tastes, that developed independently of each other, but not really different beliefs.
Also, it's not unusual and considered perfectly acceptable, for people to enjoy several types of music and cuisines once exposed to them. But you can have just one philosophy or religion at a time.
I think art easily qualifies as well - very divergent to beliefs about and forms of art.
Fashion probably qualifies as well - no consensus on what looks good
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks to the posters who gave so much thought to other fields besides religion that exhibit different beliefs within one framework.
I'd say Philosophy is the only one mentioned that really fits. The others - music, food, etc. reflect different tastes, that developed independently of each other, but not really different beliefs.
Also, it's not unusual and considered perfectly acceptable, for people to enjoy several types of music and cuisines once exposed to them. But you can have just one philosophy or religion at a time.
Anonymous wrote:Some philosophers and mathematician s think we live in a simulation. They can offer up evidence for this belief. Others disagree and can also offer proof.
Music, well there are tons. You have death metal and Kpop very different beliefs.