Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn't DEI include 508 compliancy? You know, the push to make everything accessible and inclusive to audio/visually impaired people? Will people be fired for coding documents to be read by assistive technology or making things extra legible and high contrast for colorblind people?
POTUS and co. dropped the “A” (A for accessibility). POTUS does not describe it as D-E-I-A” They dropped A on purpose.
We still like ADA laws. Although I am not sure how the rollbacks of the Civil Rights Act affect disabled peoples and who is talking about that. Seems
important to me
Anonymous wrote:Anyone involved in racist and exclusionary programs should be removed and terminated. This is a voluntary position; no one is forced to take it. I don’t want individuals with this mindset managing any part of the federal government.
Anonymous wrote:I don't know about jobs, etc. but I am happy that biological men are banned from women's sports. That was a mockery and wrong at every single level. Feel anyway you wants, identify anyway you want, dress anyway you like, and choose whatever relationship you want to be in, but stay away from women's sports. That part I am happy about.
Anonymous wrote:Doesn't DEI include 508 compliancy? You know, the push to make everything accessible and inclusive to audio/visually impaired people? Will people be fired for coding documents to be read by assistive technology or making things extra legible and high contrast for colorblind people?
Anonymous wrote:Doesn't DEI include 508 compliancy? You know, the push to make everything accessible and inclusive to audio/visually impaired people? Will people be fired for coding documents to be read by assistive technology or making things extra legible and high contrast for colorblind people?
Anonymous wrote:Anyone involved in racist and exclusionary programs should be removed and terminated. This is a voluntary position; no one is forced to take it. I don’t want individuals with this mindset managing any part of the federal government.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone involved in racist and exclusionary programs should be removed and terminated. This is a voluntary position; no one is forced to take it. I don’t want individuals with this mindset managing any part of the federal government.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone involved in racist and exclusionary programs should be removed and terminated. This is a voluntary position; no one is forced to take it. I don’t want individuals with this mindset managing any part of the federal government.[/quote
So an employee who participated in a work-sponsored workshop on inclusion at work should be fired?
But i am sure white supremacists managing the gov that’s ok for you (and i am even white).
Nobody should be fired for having attended training. Nobody should be fired unless they broke the law. What’s this? China during the cultural revolution? What’s next, people dragged and forced to recite an “apology” before a crowd?
A friend of mine from China says current events are very similar to Mao's early days.
I thought DEI stuff was getting a bit excessive but this is pure insanity.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone involved in racist and exclusionary programs should be removed and terminated. This is a voluntary position; no one is forced to take it. I don’t want individuals with this mindset managing any part of the federal government.[/quote
So an employee who participated in a work-sponsored workshop on inclusion at work should be fired?
But i am sure white supremacists managing the gov that’s ok for you (and i am even white).
Nobody should be fired for having attended training. Nobody should be fired unless they broke the law. What’s this? China during the cultural revolution? What’s next, people dragged and forced to recite an “apology” before a crowd?
Anonymous wrote:Anyone involved in racist and exclusionary programs should be removed and terminated. This is a voluntary position; no one is forced to take it. I don’t want individuals with this mindset managing any part of the federal government.