Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Blair is a strong program but niche, for STEM obviously but majority pre-engineering. RMIB is better for kids who like STEM and humanities, and produces excellent analytical writers across disciplines. Historically RMIB has had better college outcomes because Ivy+ schools prefer a broader liberal arts focus. Blair does better with MIT. Both are very competitive but RMIB students are a little more chill. Last year RMIB produced twice as many NMSF as Blair. This year it was reversed, Blair produced twice as many. So the cohorts vary too.
Debatable. From MS the truly brilliant kids went to Blair, the grinders and strivers went to RMIB.
I did notice RMIB kids tend not to have had math tutors since they were 5.
It's the opposite.
Anonymous wrote:How is your child's tolerance for BS? Try to answer this honestly question, in the privacy of your own mind. If it's very low, go to the Blair. The student needs to be able to live with BS to go to RMIB. It's a much more pompous program.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Blair is a strong program but niche, for STEM obviously but majority pre-engineering. RMIB is better for kids who like STEM and humanities, and produces excellent analytical writers across disciplines. Historically RMIB has had better college outcomes because Ivy+ schools prefer a broader liberal arts focus. Blair does better with MIT. Both are very competitive but RMIB students are a little more chill. Last year RMIB produced twice as many NMSF as Blair. This year it was reversed, Blair produced twice as many. So the cohorts vary too.
Debatable. From MS the truly brilliant kids went to Blair, the grinders and strivers went to RMIB.
I did notice RMIB kids tend not to have had math tutors since they were 5.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Blair is a strong program but niche, for STEM obviously but majority pre-engineering. RMIB is better for kids who like STEM and humanities, and produces excellent analytical writers across disciplines. Historically RMIB has had better college outcomes because Ivy+ schools prefer a broader liberal arts focus. Blair does better with MIT. Both are very competitive but RMIB students are a little more chill. Last year RMIB produced twice as many NMSF as Blair. This year it was reversed, Blair produced twice as many. So the cohorts vary too.
Debatable. From MS the truly brilliant kids went to Blair, the grinders and strivers went to RMIB.
Anonymous wrote:Blair is a strong program but niche, for STEM obviously but majority pre-engineering. RMIB is better for kids who like STEM and humanities, and produces excellent analytical writers across disciplines. Historically RMIB has had better college outcomes because Ivy+ schools prefer a broader liberal arts focus. Blair does better with MIT. Both are very competitive but RMIB students are a little more chill. Last year RMIB produced twice as many NMSF as Blair. This year it was reversed, Blair produced twice as many. So the cohorts vary too.
Anonymous wrote:RMIB has very strong STEM classes and clubs. Pick RM if kid wants to become a better writer and have a more well rounded academic experience. Don’t pick RM if they are really into programming.
But really, if commute times are different by more than 15 minutes, pick the closer commute. 2.5 hrs per week commute savings is a lot.
Anonymous wrote:My child picked Blair, mostly because of during interest in STEM plus commute. Also our home school, so an easy choice.
You should let your child choose based on interests and practicality.