Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:then, the possibility is the division will be left with a few older folks, losing younger high performers. is that what the managers want? is government efficiency achieved?
We got plenty of young low performers and older high performers. Age alone is not the only factor. And that’s how the process works. If you want older workers out, the Fork offer is as good as it gets.
Anonymous wrote:then, the possibility is the division will be left with a few older folks, losing younger high performers. is that what the managers want? is government efficiency achieved?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The RIP regs will give more retention credits for those who've been in federal service longer, so seniority almost always wins in general
But will senority matter much if they target specific parts of an agency to cut rather than doing an agency wide cut? Can they just say, hey, let's cut all of the training dept, RIF them all, couldn't they do this to get rid of a lot of people at one time?
Anonymous wrote:The RIP regs will give more retention credits for those who've been in federal service longer, so seniority almost always wins in general
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Normal RIF process is complicated and takes time to implement. Somehow I don’t think this will be a normal RIF when it happens
They have to follow the law. They'll just keep getting sued until they follow the law.
Anonymous wrote:Normal RIF process is complicated and takes time to implement. Somehow I don’t think this will be a normal RIF when it happens
Anonymous wrote:Normal RIF process is complicated and takes time to implement. Somehow I don’t think this will be a normal RIF when it happens