Anonymous wrote:DS is beyond frustrated with a kid on his teammate who goofs off and is lazy, but still manages to be successful offensively because he’s a big kid and is coordinated. He’s also a bit of a bully and if he doesn’t like another kid on the team, everyone knows it. Yet coaches continue to select him despite this behavior because he’s physically strong and can produce offensively. A lot of these negative behaviors are defense mechanisms (ie he goofs off during sprints because he’s slow, he doesn’t put much effort into playing D because he doesn’t want to get burned and look stupid, he makes fun of others to distract from his weaknesses, etc), but we’ve been playing with this kid across multiple teams/sports for years and the behaviors seem to be getting worse (now 13/14u). At what point/age do coaches decide that the behavior isn’t worth it?
At no point. Usually. If a kid is producing & a key player on the team, that is usually all that matters. Things like attitude or missing practice etc is pretty much irrelevant. The rules are different for top/key players.
Eventually the kid will (probably) no longer be a top player- the older they get the harder it is to maintain that status- and then will have to follow the rules like everyone else. He’ll either fall in line or he won’t. But until then, he can do as he pleases.
Just being honest. 3 kids and have seen this many times.