Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No sympathy here. USAID was a major grift joke and most of the aid money ended up in pockets of local corrupt leaders and tribal chiefs. Add to that a very ideological bureaucracy.
I think foreign aid is important but it's worthwhile disbanding and rebuilding a donor agency from scratch. Not sure if the existing model can survive.
Not you again. Don't you have a dog to kick or kid to yell at?
I’m not the PP but our acquaintance lost their job as a contractor from the EO.
They bragged for years about their travel all over the world to “educate” the locals on support distribution. But they openly joked by the time they “trained” someone in country and aid arrived (if ever) whomever they “trained” was long gone - so they got to go back 2-3 times to train (or not) to the same country and typically they planned stops on their way of places to visit.
I am not saying there was not some good being done; but maybe 1 out 20 dollars spent was of value from what I heard.
Then Congress should shut it down. This is about more than just the agency, it's about the U.S. straying from being a country of laws and separation of powers and moving to banana republic status.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No sympathy here. USAID was a major grift joke and most of the aid money ended up in pockets of local corrupt leaders and tribal chiefs. Add to that a very ideological bureaucracy.
I think foreign aid is important but it's worthwhile disbanding and rebuilding a donor agency from scratch. Not sure if the existing model can survive.
Not you again. Don't you have a dog to kick or kid to yell at?
I’m not the PP but our acquaintance lost their job as a contractor from the EO.
They bragged for years about their travel all over the world to “educate” the locals on support distribution. But they openly joked by the time they “trained” someone in country and aid arrived (if ever) whomever they “trained” was long gone - so they got to go back 2-3 times to train (or not) to the same country and typically they planned stops on their way of places to visit.
I am not saying there was not some good being done; but maybe 1 out 20 dollars spent was of value from what I heard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No sympathy here. USAID was a major grift joke and most of the aid money ended up in pockets of local corrupt leaders and tribal chiefs. Add to that a very ideological bureaucracy.
I think foreign aid is important but it's worthwhile disbanding and rebuilding a donor agency from scratch. Not sure if the existing model can survive.
Not you again. Don't you have a dog to kick or kid to yell at?
Anonymous wrote:No sympathy here. USAID was a major grift joke and most of the aid money ended up in pockets of local corrupt leaders and tribal chiefs. Add to that a very ideological bureaucracy.
I think foreign aid is important but it's worthwhile disbanding and rebuilding a donor agency from scratch. Not sure if the existing model can survive.
Anonymous wrote:https://x.com/ChrisMurphyCT/status/1885477974817870028
Where the F are our cowardly members of Congress??
Anonymous wrote:I don't think people are getting it - simply saying something is unconstitutional Trump is a despot isn't going to cut it.
The Democrats in Congress are going to have to get their lawyers to say - this is against the law and we are urging all USAID employees to report to work.
Those Inspector Generals that were fired? They should have shown up to work and filed for an injunction.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think people are getting it - simply saying something is unconstitutional Trump is a despot isn't going to cut it.
The Democrats in Congress are going to have to get their lawyers to say - this is against the law and we are urging all USAID employees to report to work.
Those Inspector Generals that were fired? They should have shown up to work and filed for an injunction.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think people are getting it - simply saying something is unconstitutional Trump is a despot isn't going to cut it.
The Democrats in Congress are going to have to get their lawyers to say - this is against the law and we are urging all USAID employees to report to work.
Those Inspector Generals that were fired? They should have shown up to work and filed for an injunction.
The one IG did show up and was physically removed from her office by security.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think people are getting it - simply saying something is unconstitutional Trump is a despot isn't going to cut it.
The Democrats in Congress are going to have to get their lawyers to say - this is against the law and we are urging all USAID employees to report to work.
Those Inspector Generals that were fired? They should have shown up to work and filed for an injunction.