Anonymous
Post 01/27/2025 11:16     Subject: Schedule F Memo is Out
Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain why this is a bad thing?


We can be fired at any time without cause. Get it now? Thanks and go back to your little cave
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2025 11:15     Subject: Schedule F Memo is Out
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain why this is a bad thing?

Not interesting in engaging with trolls on this. Go to google, look it up, and start a new thread if you’d like to discuss it.


That is what this thread is!

This is a different poster, just truly trying to understand what this means.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2025 11:14     Subject: Schedule F Memo is Out
Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain why this is a bad thing?

Not interesting in engaging with trolls on this. Go to google, look it up, and start a new thread if you’d like to discuss it.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2025 11:13     Subject: Schedule F Memo is Out
Can someone explain why this is a bad thing?
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2025 11:08     Subject: Schedule F Memo is Out
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can’t this go to court? And I mean quickly? Why isn’t anyone seeking an injunction?


The treasury union sued last week.


I’m not covered by the union. We need a judge to issue an injunction.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2025 11:07     Subject: Schedule F Memo is Out
Anonymous wrote:Can’t this go to court? And I mean quickly? Why isn’t anyone seeking an injunction?


+1
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2025 10:57     Subject: Schedule F Memo is Out
Anonymous wrote:I’m not a lawyer, but doesn’t the decision to end Chevron deference mean that this crazy interpretation of the civil service laws gets less weight than it previously would have?

It should, but I’m sure SCOTUS will invent a special rule that makes sure that only applies to decisions from Democratic administrations.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2025 10:56     Subject: Schedule F Memo is Out
Anonymous wrote:Can’t this go to court? And I mean quickly? Why isn’t anyone seeking an injunction?


The treasury union sued last week.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2025 10:55     Subject: Schedule F Memo is Out
Can’t this go to court? And I mean quickly? Why isn’t anyone seeking an injunction?
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2025 10:55     Subject: Schedule F Memo is Out
Anonymous wrote:Umm a president can't just nullify a reg without notice and comment. These folks clearly DGAF and will just move as fast as they can and deal with litigation as needed

+1 “Move fast and break things.”
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2025 10:51     Subject: Schedule F Memo is Out
I’m not a lawyer, but doesn’t the decision to end Chevron deference mean that this crazy interpretation of the civil service laws gets less weight than it previously would have?
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2025 10:48     Subject: Schedule F Memo is Out
"Being held accountable for the success of one or more specific programs or projects" - wow. That's incredibly broad. Great!
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2025 10:47     Subject: Schedule F Memo is Out
Umm a president can't just nullify a reg without notice and comment. These folks clearly DGAF and will just move as fast as they can and deal with litigation as needed
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2025 10:43     Subject: Schedule F Memo is Out
And of course there’s a catch all category of “whatever the OPM director says”
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2025 10:42     Subject: Schedule F Memo is Out
https://chcoc.gov/sites/default/files/OPM%20Memorandum%20re%20Schedule%20Policy%20Career%20Guidance%2001-27-2025.pdf

It is very broad. My position def falls within. Sigh.

[Edit by Admin: The same folks who are supposed to fix the government's problems can't seem to keep a web link stable for more than 24 hours. Here is a working link: ]

https://chcoc.gov/sites/default/files/OPM%20Memorandum%20re%20Schedule%20Policy%20Career%20Guidance%2001-27-25%20FINAL.pdf