Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t want to go into combat with women, it would be a burden and liability. It’s not fair on the guys.

You know, women have been c
In combat for years and it doesn't matter what you want. Lots of men have done it and most of them have been totally fine. what the f***?

Yes, I know that, but they are weaker and slower. Plus you’re would feel like, ok I have to bail her out if she’s in trouble even more so than a guy. I’m just saying I wouldn’t want to go into combat with women, but I know it happens.

Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t want to go into combat with women, it would be a burden and liability. It’s not fair on the guys.

You know, women have been c
In combat for years and it doesn't matter what you want. Lots of men have done it and most of them have been totally fine. what the f***?

I wouldn’t want to go into combat with women, it would be a burden and liability. It’s not fair on the guys.

I think women already have a very hard time balancing a military career and a family. To pressure them to also go into combat is a stretch.
Perhaps there are some women who would voluntarily go, the majority would not due to family commitments.
Women in this country do not even have paid maternity leave, so a lot would need to change for the military to be able to be a friendly workplace for women

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think it’s worth it to have women in combat. Sure, some awesome women could do it, but I think on average the men are stronger and can take the rigors of combat deployments for a longer period of time.

It's worth it to the women who want to move up the chain and for the most part you only do so if you've seen combat.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Border patrol isn’t the military or combat

Except when trump declares an emergency on the southern border to allow military personnel to perform additional functions how is that not a war zone?

Because it’s not a war zone and it’s not military combat. It’s like saying when we bring the national guard in to help with a hurricane that somehow that becomes war service. It’s not.

Walt so we aren't being invaded?

I don’t think it’s worth it to have women in combat. Sure, some awesome women could do it, but I think on average the men are stronger and can take the rigors of combat deployments for a longer period of time.

Anonymous wrote:https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/your-marine-corps/2015/09/10/mixed-gender-teams-come-up-short-in-marines-infantry-experiment/

Woke military crazies wasted 36 MILLION dollars to see if women could throw their military bags as high as the men can.

News Alert:
Females can’t throw their military bags to the required height.

Only forever Democrats and RINO warmongers want weak soldiers on the front lines.

AUDIT every single organization/institution getting my hard earned tax dollars!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Border patrol isn’t the military or combat

Except when trump declares an emergency on the southern border to allow military personnel to perform additional functions how is that not a war zone?

Because it’s not a war zone and it’s not military combat. It’s like saying when we bring the national guard in to help with a hurricane that somehow that becomes war service. It’s not.

Anonymous wrote:Border patrol isn’t the military or combat

Except when trump declares an emergency on the southern border to allow military personnel to perform additional functions how is that not a war zone?

Border patrol isn’t the military or combat

No

Anonymous wrote:If women are no longer allowed to serve in combat roles in the military does that also apply to female border patrol agents?

Yes women will not be allowed to hold some jobs. They will be removed from the military and many other careers.

If women are no longer allowed to serve in combat roles in the military does that also apply to female border patrol agents?