Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The chances of getting into Amherst are minuscule. Hence, your DD is very unlikely to have the choice to decide between the two.
They’re both very selective. Getting into both is the difficulty.
At DD’s private school, the acceptance rate to W&L is over 50 percent. The average SAT score and GPA of the accepted candidates are below 1400 and 93, respectively. Nobody has been accepted to Amherst for years. (The stats of the accepted kids to Williams are 1500 and 97, respectively).
Anonymous wrote:Seeing LAC parents fight over selectivity is hilarious. No one applies to lacs and they are hardly known
-Princeton mom, actually selective.
Btw: your kid should go to W&L. She’s gonna like it a lot more.
Anonymous wrote:DD adores the sorority culture of W&L but acknowledges that amherst is academically better. She’s interested in a career in politics or law, wants a school with good access to outdoors or hikes, big on volunteering and giving back to community, and wants to study History, English, or Econ/business.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The chances of getting into Amherst are minuscule. Hence, your DD is very unlikely to have the choice to decide between the two.
They’re both very selective. Getting into both is the difficulty.
Anonymous wrote:DS’s friend there says most of the guys are politically conservative. I don’t view this as a problem at all but something anyone going there should understand.
Anonymous wrote:The chances of getting into Amherst are minuscule. Hence, your DD is very unlikely to have the choice to decide between the two.
Anonymous wrote:Seems hard to imagine a student who's attracted to the culture at W&L would be attracted to the culture at Amherst. Neither.
Amherst is significantly more selective than W&L. See where she gets in then visit.