Anonymous wrote:I think a good mystery or thriller is when you can't quite solve the ending, but when you learn it feels like it all makes sense.
If plot twists don't make sense and there are red herrings that go nowhere, that's just bad writing. It's very annoying to invest in a thriller and then find out that all the clues and suspects end up being dead ends and not explained at all. OTOH it's so satisfying when the author ties things up. Glad you found an author you like.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Like any genre, it depends on the quality of the writing and the quality of the the plot formation and world-building.
The gold standard of modern thrillers is “Gone Girl” by Gillian Flynn.
Why is that the gold standard? Because it was a huge bestseller? I really enjoyed it but I have also enjoyed many other psychological suspense novels that are nothing like it, nor are they trying to be.
There's no gold standard.
Within the genre, and I read a lot in this genre, there are subgenres and books with varying levels of literary-ness. It just depends on what you like.
Name ‘em.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Like any genre, it depends on the quality of the writing and the quality of the the plot formation and world-building.
The gold standard of modern thrillers is “Gone Girl” by Gillian Flynn.
Why is that the gold standard? Because it was a huge bestseller? I really enjoyed it but I have also enjoyed many other psychological suspense novels that are nothing like it, nor are they trying to be.
There's no gold standard.
Within the genre, and I read a lot in this genre, there are subgenres and books with varying levels of literary-ness. It just depends on what you like.
Anonymous wrote:Like any genre, it depends on the quality of the writing and the quality of the the plot formation and world-building.
The gold standard of modern thrillers is “Gone Girl” by Gillian Flynn.
Anonymous wrote:I usually don’t read mysteries or domestic thrillers because I can’t seem to follow them, but I picked up two books by Aggie Blum Thompson based on a DCUM mention and had so much fun reading them over the holidays. She writes such fun books and I loved thinking back to the hints and clues dropped along the way and realizing how she put the story fit together.
I decided that maybe I’ve been missing out on an entire genre, so I grabbed a few random bestsellers to try.
I just read Rock Paper Scissors by Alice Feeney and I’m so mad. I don’t understand this book, I couldn’t follow the plot twists, and I’m still confused by some of the clues dropped by the author that never seemed to mean anything in the end. I’m going back and reading reviews of the book to see if I’m dumb or just missing something or if this is not a genre for me.
I’m generally an indiscriminating reader who doesn’t mind mixing up literature, non-fiction, junky novels, etc., but this book and the genre have thrown me and my identity as a reader for a loop.
Am I supposed to solve the mystery and know what the plot twists will be before they happen? Are some clues just pointless details? Did I encounter bad writing and plotting or am I a bad reader?