Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here- Apologies if it was confusing. 13:10 is right - I was not asserting rights to the millions he inherited. I was just trying to explain that his failure to pay the property settlement installment was not for lack of resources.
Thanks everyone.
I need to check to see if the agreement requires that breaching party pays for litigation to address such breach . I never should have signed this deal, I was a mess at the time due to games Ex was playing (and in retrospect should not be surprised that he would renege on legal commitments like this).
He doesn’t have the money. Millions to be inherited means nothing as he doesn’t not have that money.
Irrelevant. He signed an agreement to pay a settlement and it's time to pony up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here- Apologies if it was confusing. 13:10 is right - I was not asserting rights to the millions he inherited. I was just trying to explain that his failure to pay the property settlement installment was not for lack of resources.
Thanks everyone.
I need to check to see if the agreement requires that breaching party pays for litigation to address such breach . I never should have signed this deal, I was a mess at the time due to games Ex was playing (and in retrospect should not be surprised that he would renege on legal commitments like this).
He doesn’t have the money. Millions to be inherited means nothing as he doesn’t not have that money.
Pretty sure the OP said he inherited the money after they separated so it seems unlikely he spent it all. Agree with the other PP that your settlement agreement likely contains an attorney fees provision to enforce the agreement so that's one option. A cheaper option would be to have DCSE enforce the child support amount.
He may not have the money yet and he has to pay heavy taxes.
Then he shouldn't have proposed that settlement, and yet, he did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here- Apologies if it was confusing. 13:10 is right - I was not asserting rights to the millions he inherited. I was just trying to explain that his failure to pay the property settlement installment was not for lack of resources.
Thanks everyone.
I need to check to see if the agreement requires that breaching party pays for litigation to address such breach . I never should have signed this deal, I was a mess at the time due to games Ex was playing (and in retrospect should not be surprised that he would renege on legal commitments like this).
He doesn’t have the money. Millions to be inherited means nothing as he doesn’t not have that money.
Pretty sure the OP said he inherited the money after they separated so it seems unlikely he spent it all. Agree with the other PP that your settlement agreement likely contains an attorney fees provision to enforce the agreement so that's one option. A cheaper option would be to have DCSE enforce the child support amount.
He may not have the money yet and he has to pay heavy taxes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here- Apologies if it was confusing. 13:10 is right - I was not asserting rights to the millions he inherited. I was just trying to explain that his failure to pay the property settlement installment was not for lack of resources.
Thanks everyone.
I need to check to see if the agreement requires that breaching party pays for litigation to address such breach . I never should have signed this deal, I was a mess at the time due to games Ex was playing (and in retrospect should not be surprised that he would renege on legal commitments like this).
He doesn’t have the money. Millions to be inherited means nothing as he doesn’t not have that money.
Pretty sure the OP said he inherited the money after they separated so it seems unlikely he spent it all. Agree with the other PP that your settlement agreement likely contains an attorney fees provision to enforce the agreement so that's one option. A cheaper option would be to have DCSE enforce the child support amount.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here- Apologies if it was confusing. 13:10 is right - I was not asserting rights to the millions he inherited. I was just trying to explain that his failure to pay the property settlement installment was not for lack of resources.
Thanks everyone.
I need to check to see if the agreement requires that breaching party pays for litigation to address such breach . I never should have signed this deal, I was a mess at the time due to games Ex was playing (and in retrospect should not be surprised that he would renege on legal commitments like this).
He doesn’t have the money. Millions to be inherited means nothing as he doesn’t not have that money.
Anonymous wrote:OP here- Apologies if it was confusing. 13:10 is right - I was not asserting rights to the millions he inherited. I was just trying to explain that his failure to pay the property settlement installment was not for lack of resources.
Thanks everyone.
I need to check to see if the agreement requires that breaching party pays for litigation to address such breach . I never should have signed this deal, I was a mess at the time due to games Ex was playing (and in retrospect should not be surprised that he would renege on legal commitments like this).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here- Apologies if it was confusing. 13:10 is right - I was not asserting rights to the millions he inherited. I was just trying to explain that his failure to pay the property settlement installment was not for lack of resources.
Thanks everyone.
I need to check to see if the agreement requires that breaching party pays for litigation to address such breach . I never should have signed this deal, I was a mess at the time due to games Ex was playing (and in retrospect should not be surprised that he would renege on legal commitments like this).
He doesn’t have the money. Millions to be inherited means nothing as he doesn’t not have that money.
Anonymous wrote:OP here- Apologies if it was confusing. 13:10 is right - I was not asserting rights to the millions he inherited. I was just trying to explain that his failure to pay the property settlement installment was not for lack of resources.
Thanks everyone.
I need to check to see if the agreement requires that breaching party pays for litigation to address such breach . I never should have signed this deal, I was a mess at the time due to games Ex was playing (and in retrospect should not be surprised that he would renege on legal commitments like this).
Anonymous wrote:You are not entitled to inheritance or anything after divorce.