Anonymous wrote:Yeah, it’s the central tension of GDS for me as an alumna, at least. GDS does a great job describing and cultivating its community but does a terrible job explaining why the GDS model (highly selective and expensive private school) is good for The Community. When it was founded, it had a great answer, which was that the public schools were not integrated.

I actually think there are some good and defensible arguments for the school as it is but they are unspoken. The silence around it is really out of character for the school, and too me it is shameful.

Can you give us a single one? It's ok to admit that you send a kid to an exclusive school and that the exclusivity allows for a better academic experience.

My public high school is 5.5% black, my kid’s private school is 14%. But we all know this was a $hit stirring post not a reality based one.

Yeah, it’s the central tension of GDS for me as an alumna, at least. GDS does a great job describing and cultivating its community but does a terrible job explaining why the GDS model (highly selective and expensive private school) is good for The Community. When it was founded, it had a great answer, which was that the public schools were not integrated.

I actually think there are some good and defensible arguments for the school as it is but they are unspoken. The silence around it is really out of character for the school, and too me it is shameful.

Anonymous wrote:I haven’t come across such a refined critique of woke schools.

It all boils down to limousine liberal. It's still the best descriptor of the kind of person who believes that a 60k private is about inclusivity or lives in a $2M house while caring deeply about affordable housing

Gathering feedback on the thesis statement for your thought piece, OP?

It is as it ever was. The rich seek exclusive/exclusionary clubs, including schools. It used to be that the rich wanted everyone to know how exclusive, especially those outside the bubble.

The current fad is to pretend (1) they want their kids’ schools to be inclusive and diverse and (2) that those schools actually are inclusive and diverse. Neither is true.

Paradox? A better word is hypocrisy.

I haven’t come across such a refined critique of woke schools.

Anonymous wrote:The bubble that comes with it is the social cost of private schools.

One parent's cost is another's benefit.

Not sure that neighborhood zoned public schools are all that different, especially in the elementary years. Que all the public school parents who proudly claim that their incomes and home values are the same as private school parents...

This is like saying the sky is blue.

Anonymous wrote:In a city where private schools proudly champion inclusivity and social justice, there’s an ironic twist: these values are nurtured within exclusive bubbles, far removed from the diverse realities of public schools. Parents preach the virtues of equity but often pay top dollar to avoid sending their children to public institutions—the very environments where their talent, privilege, and resources could have the most transformative impact. Instead, inclusivity becomes a brand, polished behind ivy-covered walls, while public schools, brimming with untapped potential, are left out of the equation. Is it inclusiveness we seek—or insulation?

I'm seeking a decent education for my children.

Many of us who use privates did our time in DCPS. I sent my own kids for 10, 9 and 10 years respectively---that's a total of 29 years of DCPS education.

I'm not a picky consumer but dealing with DCPS is year-in and year-out is exhausting. We had entire school years without a permanent teacher. We had teachers leave mid year and not be replaced. My kids were never taught to write more than a RACE body paragraph (IYKYK) and in 6th grade and up never read a single full book for any English class (ironically they read more in elementary school.)

We were super active parents in DCPS--- donors to the PTA, room parents, heck I even subbed at one point. But I wanted my kids to learn to write, write and think and so we applied out for high school (and for 8th grade for the middle kid).

The bubble that comes with it is the social cost of private schools.

We’ve had this discussion many times. Parents are seeking the best academic experience for their children and are fine with bubble that comes with it.

Why are you assuming that their commitment to anything beyond educating the city's elite is more than lip service?

In a city where private schools proudly champion inclusivity and social justice, there’s an ironic twist: these values are nurtured within exclusive bubbles, far removed from the diverse realities of public schools. Parents preach the virtues of equity but often pay top dollar to avoid sending their children to public institutions—the very environments where their talent, privilege, and resources could have the most transformative impact. Instead, inclusivity becomes a brand, polished behind ivy-covered walls, while public schools, brimming with untapped potential, are left out of the equation. Is it inclusiveness we seek—or insulation?