Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There must have been an issue with getting paperwork from families who got spots in the lottery. The paperwork requirements are there either way, so I don't think it impacts the number of eligible children in the VPI lottery.
This is my guess, because the in-person submission requirement includes completing the application with APS staff. This change sounds like a way to provide support during the process to families likely to need it.
…except that many many low-income people simply will not be able to take time off from work to do this. Net, net, requiring in-person 9-5 filing will cause low-income applications to drop. Inconvenient for the middle class, but nearly impossible for working class. Sigh.
Read some of the other comments on this thread, and explain to me why it is nearly impossible for working class families to apply in-person during the day.
Cannot take time off during those hours. If they had extended hours, until maybe 7pm and on a couple of different days, that might be different.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There must have been an issue with getting paperwork from families who got spots in the lottery. The paperwork requirements are there either way, so I don't think it impacts the number of eligible children in the VPI lottery.
This is my guess, because the in-person submission requirement includes completing the application with APS staff. This change sounds like a way to provide support during the process to families likely to need it.
…except that many many low-income people simply will not be able to take time off from work to do this. Net, net, requiring in-person 9-5 filing will cause low-income applications to drop. Inconvenient for the middle class, but nearly impossible for working class. Sigh.
Read some of the other comments on this thread, and explain to me why it is nearly impossible for working class families to apply in-person during the day.
Anonymous wrote:Soooooo…..it sounds like no impact to number of applicants
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There must have been an issue with getting paperwork from families who got spots in the lottery. The paperwork requirements are there either way, so I don't think it impacts the number of eligible children in the VPI lottery.
This is my guess, because the in-person submission requirement includes completing the application with APS staff. This change sounds like a way to provide support during the process to families likely to need it.
…except that many many low-income people simply will not be able to take time off from work to do this. Net, net, requiring in-person 9-5 filing will cause low-income applications to drop. Inconvenient for the middle class, but nearly impossible for working class. Sigh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There must have been an issue with getting paperwork from families who got spots in the lottery. The paperwork requirements are there either way, so I don't think it impacts the number of eligible children in the VPI lottery.
This is my guess, because the in-person submission requirement includes completing the application with APS staff. This change sounds like a way to provide support during the process to families likely to need it.
…except that many many low-income people simply will not be able to take time off from work to do this. Net, net, requiring in-person 9-5 filing will cause low-income applications to drop. Inconvenient for the middle class, but nearly impossible for working class. Sigh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There must have been an issue with getting paperwork from families who got spots in the lottery. The paperwork requirements are there either way, so I don't think it impacts the number of eligible children in the VPI lottery.
This is my guess, because the in-person submission requirement includes completing the application with APS staff. This change sounds like a way to provide support during the process to families likely to need it.
…except that many many low-income people simply will not be able to take time off from work to do this. Net, net, requiring in-person 9-5 filing will cause low-income applications to drop. Inconvenient for the middle class, but nearly impossible for working class. Sigh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There must have been an issue with getting paperwork from families who got spots in the lottery. The paperwork requirements are there either way, so I don't think it impacts the number of eligible children in the VPI lottery.
This is my guess, because the in-person submission requirement includes completing the application with APS staff. This change sounds like a way to provide support during the process to families likely to need it.
Anonymous wrote:There must have been an issue with getting paperwork from families who got spots in the lottery. The paperwork requirements are there either way, so I don't think it impacts the number of eligible children in the VPI lottery.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In my experience almost all students in VPI have a parent who does not work or works evening/weekend hours
Yes. Often the policy advocates are higher income working parents (either dual, or single parent working households) believing they're being empathetic to the challenges of the poor, but looking at things through their own perspectives and experiences. It's highly inconvenient for typical white collar working parents to do things during the workday, therefore it must be the same for low-income parents.
Anonymous wrote:In my experience almost all students in VPI have a parent who does not work or works evening/weekend hours