Anonymous wrote:Running a business in DC sounds as awful as being a landlord in DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The government is doing its job of protecting the most vulnerable populations, who are not eligible for credit, and may not even have debit cards or even bank accounts.
I don't think they can legislate against apps, which obviously cannot deal in cash, but they can require that brick and mortars accept cash.
I support this.
Why cannot they legislate against apps doing business in DC?
Anonymous wrote:The government is doing its job of protecting the most vulnerable populations, who are not eligible for credit, and may not even have debit cards or even bank accounts.
I don't think they can legislate against apps, which obviously cannot deal in cash, but they can require that brick and mortars accept cash.
I support this.
Anonymous wrote:Need to put more cash out there for criminals to have "access" to.
Anonymous wrote:Does this apply to Uber and food delivery apps?
Anonymous wrote:Obviously because lots of people can't get credit cards. They aren't saying you have to be cash only, they are just saying that if someone can only pay with cash, you need to be able to make change and no refuse to do business with them just because they can't get a credit card.