Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly it’s insane that we simply accommodate anyone who moves into the area past kindergarten. If you move into a school area, you ought to have to find a school that has room for you. That’s the way they do it in England. And you just figure it out.
I know that’s a fantasy, but it’s nearly impossible for schools to plan year over year with the constant increases and decreases in class size
It's far easier for schools to accommodate those small enrollment changes than expecting parents to be able to find affordable housing near jobs and schools with available seats.
This country is anti-parent enough as it is.
You shouldn’t move to an area where you can't afford to live.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly it’s insane that we simply accommodate anyone who moves into the area past kindergarten. If you move into a school area, you ought to have to find a school that has room for you. That’s the way they do it in England. And you just figure it out.
I know that’s a fantasy, but it’s nearly impossible for schools to plan year over year with the constant increases and decreases in class size
It's far easier for schools to accommodate those small enrollment changes than expecting parents to be able to find affordable housing near jobs and schools with available seats.
This country is anti-parent enough as it is.
Anonymous wrote:Honestly it’s insane that we simply accommodate anyone who moves into the area past kindergarten. If you move into a school area, you ought to have to find a school that has room for you. That’s the way they do it in England. And you just figure it out.
I know that’s a fantasy, but it’s nearly impossible for schools to plan year over year with the constant increases and decreases in class size
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do not know what an illegal subject of bargaining is?
It means unions can't negotiate on that topic.
Considering 26 states are right to work states it should be 34 states outlaw the negotiation
not necessarily, that means in those 26 states an individual could negotiate their own terms. If those schools ever wanted me as a teacher, I'd definitely have class size in my contract.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do not know what an illegal subject of bargaining is?
It means unions can't negotiate on that topic.
Considering 26 states are right to work states it should be 34 states outlaw the negotiation
With an exception for civics/government class apparently
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do not know what an illegal subject of bargaining is?
It means unions can't negotiate on that topic.
Considering 26 states are right to work states it should be 34 states outlaw the negotiation

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do not know what an illegal subject of bargaining is?
It means unions can't negotiate on that topic.
Considering 26 states are right to work states it should be 34 states outlaw the negotiation
not necessarily, that means in those 26 states an individual could negotiate their own terms. If those schools ever wanted me as a teacher, I'd definitely have class size in my contract.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do not know what an illegal subject of bargaining is?
It means unions can't negotiate on that topic.
Considering 26 states are right to work states it should be 34 states outlaw the negotiation
Anonymous wrote:I do not know what an illegal subject of bargaining is?