Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.
Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.
But the Democrats are fully pushing this narrative that she was a terrible candidate.
A CNN commentator called her a “true double threat” because she could not effectively answer questions thinking on her feet nor did she prepare for expected questions.
She had a great debate, but then “nothing comes to mind” ended her campaign.
But are there any clips of her fumbling a question? I've never seen any, unless you count her answer to the "What would you have done differently?" question on The View, which I think was a very understable response.
She was asked that question repeatedly and didn’t have even a canned response.
Her CNN town hall was just terrible.
How was it terrible? I saw it and thought it was fine.
I think the fact that Trump wouldn't even show up looked far worse.
That’s great. But your opinion wasn’t shared by the American electorate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.
Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.
But the Democrats are fully pushing this narrative that she was a terrible candidate.
A CNN commentator called her a “true double threat” because she could not effectively answer questions thinking on her feet nor did she prepare for expected questions.
She had a great debate, but then “nothing comes to mind” ended her campaign.
But are there any clips of her fumbling a question? I've never seen any, unless you count her answer to the "What would you have done differently?" question on The View, which I think was a very understable response.
She was asked that question repeatedly and didn’t have even a canned response.
Her CNN town hall was just terrible.
How was it terrible? I saw it and thought it was fine.
I think the fact that Trump wouldn't even show up looked far worse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She has always come across as intelligent, articulate and very well-informed on the issues.[i]
She put Trump to shame during the debate.
I don’t even think her answer on The View that she couldn’t really think of anything she would do differently from Biden was particularly damning. She is his Vice-President, what the heck could she really have said?
And this is coming from someone who voted for Trump, but I would have done so no matter who was on the Democratic ticket.
Really? What channel are you watching, CNBS? or NBSC? Do you remember that before she was anointed after the Clooney coup against Joe, she was considered the worst vice president in history? If you don’t recall, look it up in AI. She can put a sentence together without a teleprompter.
Anonymous wrote:She has always come across as intelligent, articulate and very well-informed on the issues.[i]
She put Trump to shame during the debate.
I don’t even think her answer on The View that she couldn’t really think of anything she would do differently from Biden was particularly damning. She is his Vice-President, what the heck could she really have said?
And this is coming from someone who voted for Trump, but I would have done so no matter who was on the Democratic ticket.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.
Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.
But the Democrats are fully pushing this narrative that she was a terrible candidate.
A CNN commentator called her a “true double threat” because she could not effectively answer questions thinking on her feet nor did she prepare for expected questions.
She had a great debate, but then “nothing comes to mind” ended her campaign.
But are there any clips of her fumbling a question? I've never seen any, unless you count her answer to the "What would you have done differently?" question on The View, which I think was a very understable response.
She was asked that question repeatedly and didn’t have even a canned response.
Her CNN town hall was just terrible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.
Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.
But the Democrats are fully pushing this narrative that she was a terrible candidate.
A CNN commentator called her a “true double threat” because she could not effectively answer questions thinking on her feet nor did she prepare for expected questions.
She had a great debate, but then “nothing comes to mind” ended her campaign.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.
Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.
But the Democrats are fully pushing this narrative that she was a terrible candidate.
A CNN commentator called her a “true double threat” because she could not effectively answer questions thinking on her feet nor did she prepare for expected questions.
She had a great debate, but then “nothing comes to mind” ended her campaign.
But are there any clips of her fumbling a question? I've never seen any, unless you count her answer to the "What would you have done differently?" question on The View, which I think was a very understable response.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.
Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.
But the Democrats are fully pushing this narrative that she was a terrible candidate.
A CNN commentator called her a “true double threat” because she could not effectively answer questions thinking on her feet nor did she prepare for expected questions.
She had a great debate, but then “nothing comes to mind” ended her campaign.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.
Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.
But the Democrats are fully pushing this narrative that she was a terrible candidate.
Anonymous wrote:She wasn’t.
Too many idiots listened to RWNJ propaganda.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because she lost to Trump.
Is that really it? Is there anything more specific about what she did or failed to do?
Anonymous wrote:Because she lost to Trump.