Anonymous wrote:I saw their younger teams play this weekend at a tournament, and they were good. If your kid can get on the pre-academy team then it’s worth it.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Glad to hear actual feedback, thank you.
For what it's worth, my son is of pre travel age so I'm more interested in the coaches ability to develop and for the programs trajectory rather than the current standings and records.
I like the facilities ability to house practices indoor year round.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:2015B North top team is good
So is the 2015B middle team (Black?) lots of potential and a good coach.
Anonymous wrote:2015B North top team is good
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Top team for boys is div 3 in the younger she groups. Take that for what you will. They are trying really hard to get a boy's program consistently going every year. It always seems to basically fall apart every year, though. They brought in a Loudoun boys coach that the families like a lot better than when Adam ran the younger teams. To be frank, a number of the boys left after the siding because Adam was toxic with anger issues. He was kicked out of games for telling at arguing with refs. He is not handling the teams anymore, though.
I think they are worth checking out; but don't expect top teams in the area level of players there right now.
FCV boys > revolution solar
Anonymous wrote:Top team for boys is div 3 in the younger she groups. Take that for what you will. They are trying really hard to get a boy's program consistently going every year. It always seems to basically fall apart every year, though. They brought in a Loudoun boys coach that the families like a lot better than when Adam ran the younger teams. To be frank, a number of the boys left after the siding because Adam was toxic with anger issues. He was kicked out of games for telling at arguing with refs. He is not handling the teams anymore, though.
I think they are worth checking out; but don't expect top teams in the area level of players there right now.