Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ivy or Baker would be ok. Anyone but Braveboy. But since it’s PG, it’ll probably be Braveboy.
Oooh let’s unpack that. Tell us why you say that.
Ivy and Baker are realistic mainstream Dems who understand the executive administration of a large metropolitan county and all the budgetary and bureaucratic factors that go into such things. They are both reasonable and solid choices, and either would serve the county well.
Braveboy is not.
There’s really nothing else to say.
Yeah no. You just don’t like Braveboy because she doesn’t care about white progressive politics. She’s unashamedly tough on crime and also tough on juvenile crime. She’s pro police. She’s pro SRO. She clearly would govern from the center and not allow PG County whatever nonsense that’s going on in MoCo filter over. And that is why you don’t like her.
Wow, her tough on crime stance must explain why there’s no crime in PG, lololololololololz!
She’s stupid. Every time she opens her mouth in front of a camera, she sounds stupid. Ever see her press conferences? They’re eye-rollingly stupid. Cringeworthy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ivy or Baker would be ok. Anyone but Braveboy. But since it’s PG, it’ll probably be Braveboy.
Oooh let’s unpack that. Tell us why you say that.
Ivy and Baker are realistic mainstream Dems who understand the executive administration of a large metropolitan county and all the budgetary and bureaucratic factors that go into such things. They are both reasonable and solid choices, and either would serve the county well.
Braveboy is not.
There’s really nothing else to say.
Yeah no. You just don’t like Braveboy because she doesn’t care about white progressive politics. She’s unashamedly tough on crime and also tough on juvenile crime. She’s pro police. She’s pro SRO. She clearly would govern from the center and not allow PG County whatever nonsense that’s going on in MoCo filter over. And that is why you don’t like her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ivy or Baker would be ok. Anyone but Braveboy. But since it’s PG, it’ll probably be Braveboy.
Oooh let’s unpack that. Tell us why you say that.
Ivy and Baker are realistic mainstream Dems who understand the executive administration of a large metropolitan county and all the budgetary and bureaucratic factors that go into such things. They are both reasonable and solid choices, and either would serve the county well.
Braveboy is not.
There’s really nothing else to say.
Anonymous wrote:Braveboy was in those negative anti-Alsobrooks ads. I wouldn't vote for her for that alone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ivy or Baker would be ok. Anyone but Braveboy. But since it’s PG, it’ll probably be Braveboy.
Oooh let’s unpack that. Tell us why you say that.
Anonymous wrote:Ivy or Baker would be ok. Anyone but Braveboy. But since it’s PG, it’ll probably be Braveboy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ivy or Baker would be ok. Anyone but Braveboy. But since it’s PG, it’ll probably be Braveboy.
Are you a white progressive?
Anonymous wrote:Ivy or Baker would be ok. Anyone but Braveboy. But since it’s PG, it’ll probably be Braveboy.