Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought they said the 2nd grade test was untimed and the 3rd grade test was timed. Regardless, the test is meaningless as it is not used for CES admissions. Just for GT identification, which carries no weight at all.
FOR NOW
That’s not changing anytime soon. The office that does SIPPI (GT) identification is different from the one that does magnet/CES selection. They are not in the same page.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought they said the 2nd grade test was untimed and the 3rd grade test was timed. Regardless, the test is meaningless as it is not used for CES admissions. Just for GT identification, which carries no weight at all.
FOR NOW
Anonymous wrote:I thought they said the 2nd grade test was untimed and the 3rd grade test was timed. Regardless, the test is meaningless as it is not used for CES admissions. Just for GT identification, which carries no weight at all.
Anonymous wrote:Why are ya’ll freaking out about this. Kids take the test. Either they do well or they don’t. Life goes on.
Anonymous wrote:Yes it's timed and it's mostly a test on intuition (especially for non-verbal questions, e.g., paper folding). For verbal questions, a wide vocabulary can help a bit.
Tell your kids to try to do questions fast (opposite strategy to MAP test). If not sure, select the one that looks most correctly to them. I remotely remember that student can go back and revisit a question in each battery, but once a battery is done, they cannot go back.
3rd grade CoGAT doesn't factor into CES selection this year, so there's no-string attached to the results. Whether it would be used 2-3 years later for MS magnet selection, who knows. It's a good test to really find what your kid is good at. My son did great at this test, got accepted to CES and magnet all the way through, advanced in every magnet STEM course, but still struggled in ELA classes at HS because lack of intuition about understanding the embedded information or mood between words. My daughter did bad in paper folding (i.e., lacking spatial reasoning skills), but never find geometry a hard course later on. So my point is, don't over-interpret the score of this test.
Anonymous wrote:Really, is MCPS going to administer cogat again for rising 4th graders and 6th graders?
Anonymous wrote:Really, is MCPS going to administer cogat again for rising 4th graders and 6th graders?
Anonymous wrote:Yes it's timed and it's mostly a test on intuition (especially for non-verbal questions, e.g., paper folding). For verbal questions, a wide vocabulary can help a bit.
Tell your kids to try to do questions fast (opposite strategy to MAP test). If not sure, select the one that looks most correctly to them. I remotely remember that student can go back and revisit a question in each battery, but once a battery is done, they cannot go back.
3rd grade CoGAT doesn't factor into CES selection this year, so there's no-string attached to the results. Whether it would be used 2-3 years later for MS magnet selection, who knows. It's a good test to really find what your kid is good at. My son did great at this test, got accepted to CES and magnet all the way through, advanced in every magnet STEM course, but still struggled in ELA classes at HS because lack of intuition about understanding the embedded information or mood between words. My daughter did bad in paper folding (i.e., lacking spatial reasoning skills), but never find geometry a hard course later on. So my point is, don't over-interpret the score of this test.