Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you think the US will leave the UN? Or will the US just decimate its budget to the point it becomes totally useless
The great idea and ideal of the United Nations has been diminished because it had to include corrupt governments that have ruined the UN. I would love to see the United States withdraw its support and work with groups like Doctors Without Borders, Oxfam, Well Child and similar organizations to actually provide aid rather than grift corrupt countries. The Gates Foundation does much more than UNICEF already and smaller charities like Well Child are also effective.
There’s no reason the US can’t support the groups you mentioned. But the primary purpose of U.N. is not delivering aid.
NP.
The primary purpose ceased to meaningfully exist decades ago.
Presently, the UN is little more than the “thugs and dictators club.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you think the US will leave the UN? Or will the US just decimate its budget to the point it becomes totally useless
The great idea and ideal of the United Nations has been diminished because it had to include corrupt governments that have ruined the UN. I would love to see the United States withdraw its support and work with groups like Doctors Without Borders, Oxfam, Well Child and similar organizations to actually provide aid rather than grift corrupt countries. The Gates Foundation does much more than UNICEF already and smaller charities like Well Child are also effective.
There’s no reason the US can’t support the groups you mentioned. But the primary purpose of U.N. is not delivering aid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you think the US will leave the UN? Or will the US just decimate its budget to the point it becomes totally useless
The great idea and ideal of the United Nations has been diminished because it had to include corrupt governments that have ruined the UN. I would love to see the United States withdraw its support and work with groups like Doctors Without Borders, Oxfam, Well Child and similar organizations to actually provide aid rather than grift corrupt countries. The Gates Foundation does much more than UNICEF already and smaller charities like Well Child are also effective.
There’s no reason the US can’t support the groups you mentioned. But the primary purpose of U.N. is not delivering aid.
Anonymous wrote:With all of their ties to terrorism it is an abomination it still exists. There are other groups that can deliver aid.Anonymous wrote:Speaking of grift, I hope Stefanik will kill off UNRWA.
With all of their ties to terrorism it is an abomination it still exists. There are other groups that can deliver aid.Anonymous wrote:Speaking of grift, I hope Stefanik will kill off UNRWA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you think the US will leave the UN? Or will the US just decimate its budget to the point it becomes totally useless
The great idea and ideal of the United Nations has been diminished because it had to include corrupt governments that have ruined the UN. I would love to see the United States withdraw its support and work with groups like Doctors Without Borders, Oxfam, Well Child and similar organizations to actually provide aid rather than grift corrupt countries. The Gates Foundation does much more than UNICEF already and smaller charities like Well Child are also effective.
Anonymous wrote:Trump actually has not been very critical of the United Nations and he had a good working relation with the current UN"s SG. I do foresee some budget cuts in the future but that's about it. And the UN budget is bo early peanut compared to its mission. And Stefanik like most Ivy league grads view having a very high level political option at the UN as a thing of prestige. So the UN will be okay.
Anonymous wrote:Trump just appointed an ambassador to the UN, so I don't think we're leaving.
Anonymous wrote:Do you think the US will leave the UN? Or will the US just decimate its budget to the point it becomes totally useless