Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes I read them. Any program in its first year or two is going to have mixed results. Especially those that are not at full scale or are phased in. What you’re looking for is to see if there is a good amount of positive results and indicators that justify the program’s continuation and what/where improvements should be made.

No, that's not what I'm looking for. That's you trying to justify your choices that impact our kids.

What are you looking for, troll?
DP

You are the troll. Read the reports. Kids are still struggling.

Did/Do you think there is some miracle fix for that? Of course kids are still struggling, there is a whole wide range of kids and issues. Schools and teachers can’t snap their fingers and viola kids stop struggling anymore than they can make every family engaged and stable. What they can do is notice problems and try as best as possible to solve the problem with solutions and the time and resources at their disposal.

What this shows is they’ve identified some good resources and a good use of time and are seeing positive progress.

Yes, I do. Fund more early interventions for elementary school students.

Anonymous wrote:Can someone say what the programs are?

Social Workers who are essentially serving as a bridge until mental health services can be put in place and as a support to counselors for higher needs students/families.

Math coaches at the ES level

Structured Literacy which at the point of the evaluation included phonics, Dibels testing, preliminary training of key staff in the Science of Reading and Reading Specialist in each school(the last also has a separate program evaluation). Since then they have also trained all the ES teachers in Science of Reading and switched the ES ELA curriculum.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes I read them. Any program in its first year or two is going to have mixed results. Especially those that are not at full scale or are phased in. What you’re looking for is to see if there is a good amount of positive results and indicators that justify the program’s continuation and what/where improvements should be made.

No, that's not what I'm looking for. That's you trying to justify your choices that impact our kids.

What are you looking for, troll?
DP

You are the troll. Read the reports. Kids are still struggling.

Did/Do you think there is some miracle fix for that? Of course kids are still struggling, there is a whole wide range of kids and issues. Schools and teachers can’t snap their fingers and viola kids stop struggling anymore than they can make every family engaged and stable. What they can do is notice problems and try as best as possible to solve the problem with solutions and the time and resources at their disposal.

What this shows is they’ve identified some good resources and a good use of time and are seeing positive progress.

Can someone say what the programs are?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes I read them. Any program in its first year or two is going to have mixed results. Especially those that are not at full scale or are phased in. What you’re looking for is to see if there is a good amount of positive results and indicators that justify the program’s continuation and what/where improvements should be made.

No, that's not what I'm looking for. That's you trying to justify your choices that impact our kids.

What are you looking for, troll?
DP

You are the troll. Read the reports. Kids are still struggling.

Agai, what are you looking for?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes I read them. Any program in its first year or two is going to have mixed results. Especially those that are not at full scale or are phased in. What you’re looking for is to see if there is a good amount of positive results and indicators that justify the program’s continuation and what/where improvements should be made.

No, that's not what I'm looking for. That's you trying to justify your choices that impact our kids.

What are you looking for, troll?
DP

You are the troll. Read the reports. Kids are still struggling.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes I read them. Any program in its first year or two is going to have mixed results. Especially those that are not at full scale or are phased in. What you’re looking for is to see if there is a good amount of positive results and indicators that justify the program’s continuation and what/where improvements should be made.

No, that's not what I'm looking for. That's you trying to justify your choices that impact our kids.

What are you looking for, troll?
DP

Anonymous wrote:Yes I read them. Any program in its first year or two is going to have mixed results. Especially those that are not at full scale or are phased in. What you’re looking for is to see if there is a good amount of positive results and indicators that justify the program’s continuation and what/where improvements should be made.

No, that's not what I'm looking for. That's you trying to justify your choices that impact our kids.

Yes I read them. Any program in its first year or two is going to have mixed results. Especially those that are not at full scale or are phased in. What you’re looking for is to see if there is a good amount of positive results and indicators that justify the program’s continuation and what/where improvements should be made.

Did you read them? Very mixed results.

Seems several programs implemented are having the intended outcome:


https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2024/Well-Being%20Social%20Worker%20Services%202023-2024%20Final.pdf

https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2024/Instructional%20Mathematics%20Coach%20Program%209_19_24Final.pdf

https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/2023/Structured%20Lit%20Yr%201%20Implement%20Outcome%20Eval%20FINAL.pdf