Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WTF!

https://www.thedailybeast.com/listen-to-jeffrey-epstein-spill-intel-on-donald-trumps-white-house-on-tape-released-by-author-michael-wolff/

So another hoax.

Hoax? 100 hours of audio doesn't sound like a hoax.

Sounds like you love labeling anything you don't like as a "hoax."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did Epstein drop any other names on tape??

I didn't listen but it's interesting that the clips released as so benign. Like Epstein knew inner workings from the trump admin. Maybe but wasn't also public knowledge?

No, it wasn't public knowledge. A lot of this didn't come to light until it came out from Wolff's book, from White House leaks and so on. NOW it's public knowledge - but these tapes are showing that Epstein knew about a lot of it long before any of it was public knowledge.

Anonymous wrote:Did Epstein drop any other names on tape??

I didn't listen but it's interesting that the clips released as so benign. Like Epstein knew inner workings from the trump admin. Maybe but wasn't also public knowledge?

Anonymous wrote:WTF!

https://www.thedailybeast.com/listen-to-jeffrey-epstein-spill-intel-on-donald-trumps-white-house-on-tape-released-by-author-michael-wolff/

So another hoax.

Did Epstein drop any other names on tape??

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And yet, he has been sitting on them for years, rather than exposing Trump as a child sex predator

Trump is worst of the worst, as was Epstein. But Wolff is the kind of seedy access journo rejected by people who actually think. I know a lot of alleged genius neoliberals who ran to buy Fire and Fury - why wouldn’t Wolff swing for the fences a second time? Hard to think he believes releasing this so late helps anyone but himself.

Seedy is an apt word for Wolfe.

Not gonna lie, Wolfe probably offered to sell it to Trump first. I'm sure they dangled something to Wolfe for a long time - "Oh we are trying to lock down the donor funding...Miriam wants to ensure you will delete all copies...and we will pay you half of what you're asking..."

Once Wolfe realized that they were not going to pay up, he went public.

Anonymous wrote:And yet, he has been sitting on them for years, rather than exposing Trump as a child sex predator

Trump is worst of the worst, as was Epstein. But Wolff is the kind of seedy access journo rejected by people who actually think. I know a lot of alleged genius neoliberals who ran to buy Fire and Fury - why wouldn’t Wolff swing for the fences a second time? Hard to think he believes releasing this so late helps anyone but himself.

And yet, he has been sitting on them for years, rather than exposing Trump as a child sex predator

Anonymous wrote:Those are all lies that Epstein made up in a desperate attempt to stop Trump from destroying him. Didn't work. Epstein died under Trump's leadership, and the world sighed in relief.

Wow. Your depravity knows no level.

Those are all lies that Epstein made up in a desperate attempt to stop Trump from destroying him. Didn't work. Epstein died under Trump's leadership, and the world sighed in relief.

Why wait so long to share this? Ugh.

haha his staff are all suckers. His followers are all suckers.

It doesn't matter. Trump won't lose a single vote over this because his base doesn't care.

There. Is. No. Bottom.

Anonymous wrote:WTF!

https://www.thedailybeast.com/listen-to-jeffrey-epstein-spill-intel-on-donald-trumps-white-house-on-tape-released-by-author-michael-wolff/

Wow. It shows that Epstein knew all about the inner workings and schemings of how Trump ran the White House, and how Trump deliberately pitted different staffers against each other. That also indicates Epstein was indeed still part of Trump's inner circle, to know what was going on in such detail.

WTF!

https://www.thedailybeast.com/listen-to-jeffrey-epstein-spill-intel-on-donald-trumps-white-house-on-tape-released-by-author-michael-wolff/