Anonymous wrote:This is only compelling to the extent you believe it's true. I'm sure there was no "quid pro quo," but I also don't think for a second that a he's not thinking about the potential business consequences of a Harris endorsement under a Trump presidency.
Ultimately, though, to me, it's a bad call for the owner to override the editorial board regardless of why. It makes the Washington Post less trustworthy, not more, totally independent of anything to do with Trump.
Agreed.
And I’m totally fine with the editorial board making a decision to not endorse.