Anonymous wrote:Great deal for these international athletes, but if we had more college programs, surely more US kids could play D1.
Now to be fair these big powerhouse schools have Club soccer, but we all know that’s not the same - not even as good as D3 soccer.
Anonymous wrote:Why don’t many of the perennial big sports schools have men’s soccer?
UT, Georgia Tech, University of Georgia, University of Arizona DO NOT - NOR HAVE THEY EVER HAD - D1 men’s soccer. The list goes on and on. These are all in soccer hot beds. Why no D1 MENS soccer (I know they have powerhouse women’s teams).
Is this part of the problem with the USMNT? The ACC has always had great men’s soccer and sent many guys to the national team (NC State). I know the better route seems to be going to Europe and joining an academy, but maybe our big powerhouse sports schools could compete with that? Going straight to MLS is another option but also doesn’t seem great.
I know Title IX is an issue but why not add Women’s Flag Football and Men’s Soccer at these universities? Our college system worked for Women’s Soccer (obviously) - we just don’t really have a full men’s soccer college program in the US. Might even be a revenue sport (I’d be surprised if Men’s Soccer at UMD isn’t making money).
Anyone know the history? Is it just Title IX?
Anonymous wrote:There are three main reasons why some major universities such as Georgia, Georgia Tech, Florida, Arizona, Purdue, Illinois, etc do not have men's soccer.
1.) Title IX: A law that requires the same number of women's athletic scholarships as men's at each institution. This was meant to level the playing field, and while people are free to bemoan this - it being implemented decades ago is a major reason why the US Women's Soccer program, US basketball teams, etc have excelled on the world stage.
2.) American Football: Because there are a limited number of scholarships, funds, and allotments per Title IX - a large chunk of the funding goes to football. Most football rosters have 50-plus players and well over half of those are on significant scholarship, particularly at a major university. Because everything is a business, this is unlikely to change as long as 60,000 seat stadiums are getting sold out throughout the fall and much of the winter.
3.) Marketing and Revenue: Soccer doesn't make money. They don't sell many tickets or any merchandise. I am on the belief that could change with the right marketing and structure. It is unlikely to do so in the next decade or so. Alot of people can tell you who made the basketball or football final 4 last year. Safe to say only the hard core enthusiast can tell you about soccer. It's a shame, and kids should be watching more college soccer. With a basic ESPN subscription almost every men's and women's game is available to watch live or on demand.
Anonymous wrote:There are three main reasons why some major universities such as Georgia, Georgia Tech, Florida, Arizona, Purdue, Illinois, etc do not have men's soccer.
1.) Title IX: A law that requires the same number of women's athletic scholarships as men's at each institution. This was meant to level the playing field, and while people are free to bemoan this - it being implemented decades ago is a major reason why the US Women's Soccer program, US basketball teams, etc have excelled on the world stage.
2.) American Football: Because there are a limited number of scholarships, funds, and allotments per Title IX - a large chunk of the funding goes to football. Most football rosters have 50-plus players and well over half of those are on significant scholarship, particularly at a major university. Because everything is a business, this is unlikely to change as long as 60,000 seat stadiums are getting sold out throughout the fall and much of the winter.
3.) Marketing and Revenue: Soccer doesn't make money. They don't sell many tickets or any merchandise. I am on the belief that could change with the right marketing and structure. It is unlikely to do so in the next decade or so. Alot of people can tell you who made the basketball or football final 4 last year. Safe to say only the hard core enthusiast can tell you about soccer. It's a shame, and kids should be watching more college soccer. With a basic ESPN subscription almost every men's and women's game is available to watch live or on demand.

Anonymous wrote:Most of the better college programs rely heavily on international players anyway. This year at UMd, for example, 9 of the usual starting lineup is from outside the US. it’s quite a telling indictment of youth development in the US.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No school in the Big 12 has men’s soccer. West Virginia, Texas Tech, and so on. It’s a shame.
West Virginia has a men's DI soccer team. They play in the MAC because no other university in the Big 12 has a men's program. Their team is actually very good.
Anonymous wrote:Why don’t many of the perennial big sports schools have men’s soccer?
UT, Georgia Tech, University of Georgia, University of Arizona DO NOT - NOR HAVE THEY EVER HAD - D1 men’s soccer. The list goes on and on. These are all in soccer hot beds. Why no D1 MENS soccer (I know they have powerhouse women’s teams).
Is this part of the problem with the USMNT? The ACC has always had great men’s soccer and sent many guys to the national team (NC State). I know the better route seems to be going to Europe and joining an academy, but maybe our big powerhouse sports schools could compete with that? Going straight to MLS is another option but also doesn’t seem great.
I know Title IX is an issue but why not add Women’s Flag Football and Men’s Soccer at these universities? Our college system worked for Women’s Soccer (obviously) - we just don’t really have a full men’s soccer college program in the US. Might even be a revenue sport (I’d be surprised if Men’s Soccer at UMD isn’t making money).
Anyone know the history? Is it just Title IX?
Anonymous wrote:No school in the Big 12 has men’s soccer. West Virginia, Texas Tech, and so on. It’s a shame.