Anonymous wrote:These rules are completely outdated. Schools should encourage the use of AI to support writing. There is no reason to focus on grammar structure etc when the importance is orchestrating ideas etc to own and paper. Sad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was prepared to defend the school because I generally despise parents like this, but after reading the article I understand why they’re upset. The school’s AI policy is horrible, they should use AI to write them a new policy.
You would despise most of the White people in Hingham. Don’t they run a program to check for plagiarism? If he only read AI info and didn’t use it then nothing would show up. Their argument is the written policy is poorly written and their kid is too stupid to understand it.
I agree the parents are right to challenge the decision. There was no policy, he wrote the paper using it as a research tool, which was not against policy. AFTER the fact they edited the policy. Not cool. You can't punish someone for violating a policy that did not exist at the time.
And, even if they did run a program to check AI detection programs are horrible at actually detecting AI. Many, many people have reported that papers that absolutely did not use it get flagged as AI content. No school should be basing any decisions on these tools.
Anonymous wrote:These rules are completely outdated. Schools should encourage the use of AI to support writing. There is no reason to focus on grammar structure etc when the importance is orchestrating ideas etc to own and paper. Sad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was prepared to defend the school because I generally despise parents like this, but after reading the article I understand why they’re upset. The school’s AI policy is horrible, they should use AI to write them a new policy.
You would despise most of the White people in Hingham. Don’t they run a program to check for plagiarism? If he only read AI info and didn’t use it then nothing would show up. Their argument is the written policy is poorly written and their kid is too stupid to understand it.
I agree the parents are right to challenge the decision. There was no policy, he wrote the paper using it as a research tool, which was not against policy. AFTER the fact they edited the policy. Not cool. You can't punish someone for violating a policy that did not exist at the time.
And, even if they did run a program to check AI detection programs are horrible at actually detecting AI. Many, many people have reported that papers that absolutely did not use it get flagged as AI content. No school should be basing any decisions on these tools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was prepared to defend the school because I generally despise parents like this, but after reading the article I understand why they’re upset. The school’s AI policy is horrible, they should use AI to write them a new policy.
You would despise most of the White people in Hingham. Don’t they run a program to check for plagiarism? If he only read AI info and didn’t use it then nothing would show up. Their argument is the written policy is poorly written and their kid is too stupid to understand it.
Anonymous wrote:I was prepared to defend the school because I generally despise parents like this, but after reading the article I understand why they’re upset. The school’s AI policy is horrible, they should use AI to write them a new policy.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/news/parents-sue-school-massachusetts-son-203004528.html
Seems like these parents are really doing their kid a disservice. He broke the rules but they are going scorched earth to try to bail him out. How are we going to maintain any public school standards when parents act like this? This is why we can’t keep good teachers.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/news/parents-sue-school-massachusetts-son-203004528.html
Seems like these parents are really doing their kid a disservice. He broke the rules but they are going scorched earth to try to bail him out. How are we going to maintain any public school standards when parents act like this? This is why we can’t keep good teachers.
Anonymous wrote:You’re saying he broke the rules. They are saying he did not, and didn’t use AI in the writing of the paper.
https://www.wcvb.com/article/hingham-high-school-ai-lawsuit/62602947